Insurance and Equality Revisited

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


Theorists of the welfare state increasingly recognize that social insurance programs are not well-justified by distributive egalitarianism, meaning concern for equality considered as a pattern in the distribution of some good. However, recent work by several relational egalitarian theorists suggests that these programs may be justified on relational egalitarian grounds. Relational egalitarians hold that the proper object of egalitarian concern is the way that citizens relate to one another. In this paper, I review the problems facing a distributive egalitarian justification for social insurance before considering and rejecting three relational egalitarian justifications. I close by offering a justification for these programs grounded in efficiency, not equality.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)205-226
Number of pages22
JournalPublic Affairs Quarterly
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jul 2018


Dive into the research topics of 'Insurance and Equality Revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this