Insurance status is a potent predictor of outcomes in both blunt and penetrating trauma

Wendy R. Greene*, Tolulope A. Oyetunji, Umar Bowers, Adil H. Haider, Thomas A. Mellman, Edward E. Cornwell, Suryanarayana M. Siram, David C. Chang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

112 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Patients with penetrating injuries are known to have worse outcomes than those with blunt trauma. We hypothesize that within each injury mechanism there should be no outcome difference between insured and uninsured patients. Methods: The National Trauma Data Bank version 7 was analyzed. Patients aged 65 years and older and burn patients were excluded. The insurance status was categorized as insured (private, government/military, or Medicaid) and uninsured. Multivariate analysis adjusted for insurance status, mechanism of injury, age, race, sex, injury severity score, shock, head injury, extremity injury, teaching hospital status, and year. Results: A total of 1,203,243 patients were analyzed, with a mortality rate of 3.7%. The death rate was significantly higher in penetrating trauma patients versus blunt trauma patients (7.9% vs 3.0%; P < .001), and higher in the uninsured (5.3% vs 3.2%; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, uninsured patients had an increased odds of death than insured patients, in both penetrating and blunt trauma patients. Penetrating trauma patients with insurance still had a greater risk of death than blunt trauma patients without insurance. Conclusions: Insurance status is a potent predictor of outcome in both penetrating and blunt trauma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)554-557
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume199
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2010

Keywords

  • Health disparities
  • Insurance status
  • Mechanism of injury
  • National trauma data bank
  • Outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Insurance status is a potent predictor of outcomes in both blunt and penetrating trauma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Greene, W. R., Oyetunji, T. A., Bowers, U., Haider, A. H., Mellman, T. A., Cornwell, E. E., Siram, S. M., & Chang, D. C. (2010). Insurance status is a potent predictor of outcomes in both blunt and penetrating trauma. American Journal of Surgery, 199(4), 554-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.11.005