Integrated neural representations of odor intensity and affective valence in human amygdala

Joel S. Winston*, Jay A. Gottfried, James M. Kilner, Raymond J. Dolan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

210 Scopus citations

Abstract

Arousal and valence are proposed to represent fundamental dimensions of emotion. The neural substrates for processing these aspects of stimuli are studied widely, with recent studies of chemosensory processing suggesting the amygdala processes intensity (a surrogate for arousal) rather than valence. However, these investigations have assumed that a valence effect in the amygdala is linear such that testing valence extremes is sufficient to infer responses across valence space. In this study, we tested an alternative hypothesis, namely that valence responses in the amygdala are nonlinear. Using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging, we measured amygdala responses to high- and low-concentration variants of pleasant, neutral, and unpleasant odors. Our results demonstrate that the amygdala exhibits an intensity-by-valence interaction in olfactory processing. In other words, the effect of intensity on amygdala activity is not the same at all levels of valence. Specifically, the amygdala responds differentially to high (vs low)-intensity odor for pleasant and unpleasant smells but not for neutral smells. This implies that the amygdala codes neither intensity nor valence per se, but a combination that we suggest reflects the overall emotional value of a stimulus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8903-8907
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume25
Issue number39
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 28 2005

Keywords

  • Amygdala
  • Arousal
  • Chemosensory
  • Emotion
  • Odor
  • Olfactory
  • fMRI

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Integrated neural representations of odor intensity and affective valence in human amygdala'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this