Abstract
Pragmatic information, such as inferences regarding upcoming coreference, has been shown to influence phonetic perception (Rohde & Ettlinger, 2012). Pragmatic information, however, comes in many forms. Using a Visual World Paradigm, tracking listeners' categorical responses and the time-course of information integration via eye movements, we investigated whether and how a different kind of pragmatic information, the contrastive function of prenominal adjectives (Sedivy, Tanenhaus, Chambers, & Carlson, 1999), can affect listeners' perception of voicing in initial plosives. Our results suggest that the pragmatic contrast inference did not affect the behavioral judgments on phonetic categorization, but it did have an (albeit limited) influence during the online processing of voice onset time (VOT). Our findings suggest that different kinds of higher-level pragmatic inferences are not uniform in how (successfully) they are integrated with low-level phonetic properties in real-time comprehension.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 20 |
Journal | Laboratory Phonology |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2019 |
Keywords
- Contrastive inference
- Cue integration
- Eye-tracking
- Pragmatics
- Speech perception
- VOT
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Podiatry
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language
- Computer Science Applications