Intensity of aphasia therapy: Evidence and efficacy

Leora R. Cherney*, Janet P. Patterson, Anastasia M. Raymer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

54 Scopus citations

Abstract

Determining the optimal amount and intensity of treatment is essential to the design and implementation of any treatment program for aphasia. A growing body of evidence, both behavioral and biological, suggests that intensive therapy positively impacts outcomes. We update a systematic review of treatment studies that directly compares conditions of higher and lower intensity treatment for aphasia. We identify five studies published since 2006, review them for methodologic quality, and synthesize their findings with previous ones. For both acute and chronic aphasia, results at the language impairment and communication activity/participation levels tend to be more equivocal than previously demonstrated, with no clear differences between intensive and nonintensive treatment emerging across studies. Future research directions are discussed including research design, definitions of treatment intensity, and behavioral and biological measurement of short- and long-term changes following implementation of an intensive treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)560-569
Number of pages10
JournalCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2011

Keywords

  • Acquired aphasia
  • Aphasia
  • Language therapy
  • Rehabilitation
  • Systematic review
  • Treatment efficacy
  • Treatment intensity
  • Treatment outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Intensity of aphasia therapy: Evidence and efficacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this