Intergroup contact and pluralistic ignorance

J. Nicole Shelton*, Jennifer A. Richeson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

326 Scopus citations


The present work examined the relationship between people's own interpretations of why they avoid intergroup contact and their interpretations of why out-groups avoid intergroup contact. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrate that Whites and Blacks would like to have more contact with the out-group but believe the out-group does not want to have contact with them. Studies 3-5 show that Whites and Blacks make divergent explanations about their own and their potential out-group partner's failure to initiate contact. Specifically, individuals explained their own inaction in terms of their fear of being rejected because of their race but attributed the out-group members' inaction to their lack of interest. Study 6 examined the behavioral consequences of this self-other bias. Finally, Study 7 applied theoretical work on the extended contact hypothesis to explore a means to reduce this self-other bias. The implications of these studies for improving intergroup interactions are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-107
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of personality and social psychology
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Intergroup contact and pluralistic ignorance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this