Internet Administration of Paper-and-Pencil Questionnaires Used in Couple Research: Assessing Psychometric Equivalence

Rebecca L. Brock, Robin A. Barry, Erika Lawrence, Jodi Dey, Jaci Rolffs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

56 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study examined the psychometric equivalence of paper-and-pencil and Internet formats of key questionnaires used in couple research. Self-report questionnaires assessing interpersonal constructs (relationship satisfaction, communication/conflict management, partner support, emotional intimacy) and intrapersonal constructs (individual traits, psychological symptoms, contextual influences) were administered to young adults in committed dating relationships. The same measures were administered twice via paper-and-pencil and/or Internet methods over a 2-week period. Method order was counterbalanced among participants, and temporal stability was controlled. Intrapersonal and interpersonal measures generally remained reliable when administered online and demonstrated quantitative and qualitative equivalence across methods. The implications of online administration of questionnaires are discussed, and specific recommendations are made for researchers who wish to transition to online data collection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)226-242
Number of pages17
JournalAssessment
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Funding

Data collection and analyses were supported by grants from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (R49 CCR721682 and R49 CE721682), the National Institute for Child and Human Development (RO1 HD046789), and The University of Iowa.

Keywords

  • Internet
  • couples
  • online
  • psychometric equivalence
  • self-report

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Internet Administration of Paper-and-Pencil Questionnaires Used in Couple Research: Assessing Psychometric Equivalence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this