TY - JOUR
T1 - Intimate Partner Violence Detected during Abortion-Related Visits
T2 - A Systematic Review of Screenings and Interventions
AU - Sabloak, Thwisha
AU - Ryan, Isa
AU - Nahi, Skylar
AU - Eucalitto, Patrick
AU - Simon, Melissa A.
AU - Premkumar, Ashish
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/2/16
Y1 - 2024/2/16
N2 - Objective: To perform a systematic review of screening tools and interventions focused on reducing adverse health outcomes associated with intimate partner violence (IPV) at abortion-related visits. Study Design: Studies were eligible if they included individuals seeking pregnancy options health care services in the United States, screening for or implementation of an intervention for IPV, and were published in English after the year 2000. The primary outcomes were to summarize screening tools, interventions studied, and if interventions led to individuals being connected to IPV-related resources. Secondary outcomes included patient responses to the IPV-related interventions and any other outcomes reported by the studies (PROSPERO #42021252199). Results: Among 4,205 abstracts identified, nine studies met inclusion criteria. The majority (n = 6) employed the ARCHES (Addressing Reproductive Coercion in Health Settings) tool for identification of IPV. Interventions included provider-facilitated discussions of IPV, a safety card with information about IPV and community-based resources, and referral pathways to directly connect patients with support services. For the primary outcome, IPV-related interventions were shown to better inform patients of available IPV-related resources as compared to no intervention at all. For the secondary outcomes, screening and intervening on IPV were associated with improvements in patient perception of provider empathy (i.e., caring about safety) and safer responses by patients to unhealthy relationships. Conclusion: Screening for and intervening on IPV at abortion-related visits are associated with positive outcomes for patient safety and the patient-provider relationship. However, data on effective tools for identifying and supporting these patients are extremely limited. This review emphasizes the unmet need for implementation and evaluation of IPV-specific interventions during abortion-related clinical encounters.
AB - Objective: To perform a systematic review of screening tools and interventions focused on reducing adverse health outcomes associated with intimate partner violence (IPV) at abortion-related visits. Study Design: Studies were eligible if they included individuals seeking pregnancy options health care services in the United States, screening for or implementation of an intervention for IPV, and were published in English after the year 2000. The primary outcomes were to summarize screening tools, interventions studied, and if interventions led to individuals being connected to IPV-related resources. Secondary outcomes included patient responses to the IPV-related interventions and any other outcomes reported by the studies (PROSPERO #42021252199). Results: Among 4,205 abstracts identified, nine studies met inclusion criteria. The majority (n = 6) employed the ARCHES (Addressing Reproductive Coercion in Health Settings) tool for identification of IPV. Interventions included provider-facilitated discussions of IPV, a safety card with information about IPV and community-based resources, and referral pathways to directly connect patients with support services. For the primary outcome, IPV-related interventions were shown to better inform patients of available IPV-related resources as compared to no intervention at all. For the secondary outcomes, screening and intervening on IPV were associated with improvements in patient perception of provider empathy (i.e., caring about safety) and safer responses by patients to unhealthy relationships. Conclusion: Screening for and intervening on IPV at abortion-related visits are associated with positive outcomes for patient safety and the patient-provider relationship. However, data on effective tools for identifying and supporting these patients are extremely limited. This review emphasizes the unmet need for implementation and evaluation of IPV-specific interventions during abortion-related clinical encounters.
KW - Dobbs decision
KW - abortion visits
KW - intervention
KW - intimate partner violence
KW - reproductive health
KW - screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85185822341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85185822341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/s-0044-1779746
DO - 10.1055/s-0044-1779746
M3 - Article
C2 - 38365213
AN - SCOPUS:85185822341
SN - 0735-1631
VL - 41
SP - 1697
EP - 1705
JO - American journal of perinatology
JF - American journal of perinatology
IS - 12
ER -