Intra-articular MM-II for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis pain: Efficacy and safety results from a 26-week, phase 2b, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized dose-ranging trial

Thomas J. Schnitzer*, Xavier Chevalier, Helene Rovsing, Edith Lau, Sidsel L. Boll, Ballari Brahmachari, Richard C. Chou, Tarini Joshi, Roni Wechsler, Siu Long Yao, Sveta Weiner, Mudgal Kothekar, Asger R. Bihlet, Philip G. Conaghan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: Determine optimal dose, efficacy, and safety of MM-II, a suspension of large empty liposomes, for knee osteoarthritis (OA) pain. Method: A double-blind phase 2b study (NCT04506463) randomized participants 3:3:3:1:3:1 to one intra-articular injection of 1, 3, or 6 mL MM-II or 1, 3, or 6 mL placebo, respectively. Inclusion criteria included age ≥40 years and radiographic and symptomatic knee OA. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC) pain (range, 0–4) 12 weeks post-injection (multiplicity-adjusted). Secondary endpoints included weekly average of daily knee pain (WADP), WOMAC pain at other visits, WOMAC function, patient global assessment (PtGA), and rescue medication use. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: Overall, 396 participants received treatment. In the 3 mL MM-II vs placebo group, WOMAC pain numerically improved at week 12 (least squares mean difference [95% confidence interval], −0.24 [−0.48, 0.00]; unadjusted P = 0.047; multiplicity-adjusted P = 0.085 [primary endpoint not met]). In the same 3 mL group, WADP showed improvements at week 12 (−10.9 [−18.9, −2.8]) lasting through week 26 (−11.8 [−20.4, −3.3]; unadjusted P <0.01 at both time points). Numeric improvements were also seen in WOMAC function from week 8–26, and PtGA at weeks 16 and 26. Rescue medication use with 3 mL MM-II was consistent with reduced pain. Results were numerically superior with 3 mL MM-II vs 1 mL MM-II; 6 mL MM-II was the least efficacious dose. MM-II was well tolerated, with low TEAE incidence. Conclusion: MM-II was safe, and the optimal effective dose for the treatment of knee OA pain was 3 mL.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)897-906
Number of pages10
JournalOsteoarthritis and Cartilage
Volume33
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2025

Funding

We thank the trial participants, their families, and study site personnel. Medical writing support was provided by Amin Ghane, PhD, of AlphaBioCom, a Red Nucleus company, and funded by Sun Pharma and Moebius Medical Ltd. PGC is supported in part by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Leeds Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) (NIHR203331). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Keywords

  • Clinical trial
  • Knee
  • Liposome
  • MM-II
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Pain
  • Phase 2

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intra-articular MM-II for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis pain: Efficacy and safety results from a 26-week, phase 2b, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized dose-ranging trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this