TY - JOUR
T1 - Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery
T2 - Indications, efficacy, and role of the preoperative checklist
AU - Lall, Rohan R.
AU - Hauptman, Jason S.
AU - Munoz, Carlos
AU - Cybulski, George R.
AU - Koski, Tyler
AU - Ganju, Aruna
AU - Fessler, Richard G.
AU - Smith, Zachary A.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Spine surgery carries an inherent risk of damage to critical neural structures. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is frequently used to improve the safety of spine surgery by providing real-time assessment of neural structures at risk. Evidence-based guidelines for safe and efficacious use of IONM are lacking and its use is largely driven by surgeon preference and medicolegal issues. Due to this lack of standardization, the preoperative sign-in serves as a critical opportunity for 3-way discussion between the neurosurgeon, anesthesiologist, and neuromonitoring team regarding the necessity for and goals of IONM in the ensuing case. This analysis contains a review of commonly used IONM modalities including somatosensory evoked potentials, motor evoked potentials,spontaneous or free-running electromyography, triggered electromyography, and combined multimodal IONM. For each modality the methodology, interpretation, and reported sensitivity and specificity for neurological injury are addressed.This is followed by a discussion of important IONM-related issues to include in the preoperative checklist,including anestheticprotocol, warning criteria for possible neurological injury, and consideration of what steps to take in response to a positive alarm. The authors conclude with a cost-effectiveness analysis of IONM, and offer recommendations for IONM use during various forms of spine surgery, including both complex spine and minimally invasive procedures, as well as lower-risk spinal operations.
AB - Spine surgery carries an inherent risk of damage to critical neural structures. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is frequently used to improve the safety of spine surgery by providing real-time assessment of neural structures at risk. Evidence-based guidelines for safe and efficacious use of IONM are lacking and its use is largely driven by surgeon preference and medicolegal issues. Due to this lack of standardization, the preoperative sign-in serves as a critical opportunity for 3-way discussion between the neurosurgeon, anesthesiologist, and neuromonitoring team regarding the necessity for and goals of IONM in the ensuing case. This analysis contains a review of commonly used IONM modalities including somatosensory evoked potentials, motor evoked potentials,spontaneous or free-running electromyography, triggered electromyography, and combined multimodal IONM. For each modality the methodology, interpretation, and reported sensitivity and specificity for neurological injury are addressed.This is followed by a discussion of important IONM-related issues to include in the preoperative checklist,including anestheticprotocol, warning criteria for possible neurological injury, and consideration of what steps to take in response to a positive alarm. The authors conclude with a cost-effectiveness analysis of IONM, and offer recommendations for IONM use during various forms of spine surgery, including both complex spine and minimally invasive procedures, as well as lower-risk spinal operations.
KW - Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring
KW - Motor evoked potential
KW - Preoperative checklist
KW - Somatosensory evoked potential
KW - Spine surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871443895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871443895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3171/2012.9.FOCUS12235
DO - 10.3171/2012.9.FOCUS12235
M3 - Article
C2 - 23116090
AN - SCOPUS:84871443895
SN - 1092-0684
VL - 33
JO - Neurosurgical Focus
JF - Neurosurgical Focus
IS - 5
M1 - E10
ER -