TY - JOUR
T1 - Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Arterial and Deep Venous Interventions
T2 - Multidisciplinary Expert Opinion From SCAI/AVF/AVLS/SIR/SVM/SVS
AU - Secemsky, Eric A.
AU - Aronow, Herbert D.
AU - Kwolek, Christopher J.
AU - Meissner, Mark
AU - Muck, Patrick E.
AU - Parikh, Sahil A.
AU - Winokur, Ronald S.
AU - George, Jon C.
AU - Salazar, Gloria
AU - Murphy, Erin H.
AU - Costantino, Mary M.
AU - Zhou, Wei
AU - Li, Jun
AU - Lookstein, Robert
AU - Desai, Kush R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - Percutaneous revascularization is the primary strategy for treating lower extremity venous and arterial disease. Angiography is limited by its ability to accurately size vessels, precisely determine the degree of stenosis and length of lesions, characterize lesion morphology, or correctly diagnose postintervention complications. These limitations are overcome with use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). IVUS has demonstrated the ability to improve outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention, and there is increasing evidence to support its benefits in the setting of peripheral vascular intervention. At this stage in its evolution, there remains a need to standardize the use and approach to peripheral vascular IVUS imaging. This manuscript represents considerations and consensus perspectives that emerged from a roundtable discussion including 15 physicians with expertise in interventional cardiology, interventional radiology, and vascular surgery, representing 6 cardiovascular specialty societies, held on February 3, 2023. The roundtable's aims were to assess the current state of lower extremity revascularization, identify knowledge gaps and need for evidence, and determine how IVUS can improve care and outcomes for patients with peripheral arterial and deep venous pathology.
AB - Percutaneous revascularization is the primary strategy for treating lower extremity venous and arterial disease. Angiography is limited by its ability to accurately size vessels, precisely determine the degree of stenosis and length of lesions, characterize lesion morphology, or correctly diagnose postintervention complications. These limitations are overcome with use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). IVUS has demonstrated the ability to improve outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention, and there is increasing evidence to support its benefits in the setting of peripheral vascular intervention. At this stage in its evolution, there remains a need to standardize the use and approach to peripheral vascular IVUS imaging. This manuscript represents considerations and consensus perspectives that emerged from a roundtable discussion including 15 physicians with expertise in interventional cardiology, interventional radiology, and vascular surgery, representing 6 cardiovascular specialty societies, held on February 3, 2023. The roundtable's aims were to assess the current state of lower extremity revascularization, identify knowledge gaps and need for evidence, and determine how IVUS can improve care and outcomes for patients with peripheral arterial and deep venous pathology.
KW - expert opinion
KW - intravascular imaging
KW - peripheral vascular disease
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85184819204&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85184819204&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.11.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.11.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 38206255
AN - SCOPUS:85184819204
SN - 1051-0443
VL - 35
SP - 335
EP - 348
JO - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
JF - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
IS - 3
ER -