Sanja Kutnjak Ivković, Shari Seidman Diamond, Valerie P. Hans, Nancy S. Marder

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingForeword/postscript

1 Scopus citations


Many countries around the globe rely on ordinary citizens, untrained in the law, to decide the guilt or innocence of their fellow citizens. Some countries use all-layperson juries, while others use mixed tribunals or mixed courts in which professional judges and lay citizens work together to decide a case. Still other countries use lay magistrates or lay judges working alone or on panels. This book provides a view of the different forms of lay participation and the ways in which they are evolving. It offers a comprehensive picture of how some countries have made recent and remarkable advances toward lay decision-making, while others have a long-standing form of lay participation that is well accepted in that country. Still other countries have faced challenges with lay participation and have opted for limiting the scope of lay legal decision-making or even abolishing it. The organization of this book illustrates that lay participation in a country is not fixed in stone; lay participation is being advanced, reinforced, or replaced in countries around the world. These shifting responses to lay participation suggest the prime importance of stepping back and taking a global perspective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationJuries, Lay Judges, and Mixed Courts
Subtitle of host publicationA Global Perspective
PublisherCambridge University Press
Number of pages22
ISBN (Electronic)9781108669290
ISBN (Print)9781108483940
StatePublished - Jan 1 2021


  • Citizens
  • Criminal courts
  • Jury
  • Lay assessors
  • Lay judges
  • Lay participation
  • Legal decision-making
  • Magistrates
  • Mixed courts
  • Mixed tribunals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences


Dive into the research topics of 'Introduction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this