TY - JOUR
T1 - Investigating a multistakeholder alliance approach to reducing hospital readmissions
AU - Duckett, Philethea
AU - Kang, Raymond
AU - Hamil, Jaime
AU - Harvey, Jillian
AU - Goodman, David C.
AU - McHugh, Megan
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright 2016 National Association for Healthcare Quality.
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - There is growing appreciation that significant improvements in healthcare quality cannot be achieved by organizations working in isolation. To that end, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) initiative provides multistakeholder alliances-groups of payers, purchasers, providers, and consumers that work together-with funding and technical assistance to improve healthcare community wide. Reducing readmissions was one of the several AF4Q goals. Alliances crafted their own interventions, tailored to address the communities' unique needs, and took advantage of local resources. Our objective was to determine whether readmission rates declined more in AF4Q communities than in non-AF4Q communities by year 7 of the 10-year initiative. We conducted a quasiexperimental study using zip code-level demographics and 30-day readmission rates for all medical and surgical discharges using Medicare claims data for 2008 through 2012. This interim analysis found that AF4Q was not associated with significant reductions in medical orsurgical readmissions, suggesting that AF4Q's multistakeholder approach was no more effective at reducing readmissions than other national efforts, such as the Hospital Reduction Program under the Affordable Care Act.
AB - There is growing appreciation that significant improvements in healthcare quality cannot be achieved by organizations working in isolation. To that end, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) initiative provides multistakeholder alliances-groups of payers, purchasers, providers, and consumers that work together-with funding and technical assistance to improve healthcare community wide. Reducing readmissions was one of the several AF4Q goals. Alliances crafted their own interventions, tailored to address the communities' unique needs, and took advantage of local resources. Our objective was to determine whether readmission rates declined more in AF4Q communities than in non-AF4Q communities by year 7 of the 10-year initiative. We conducted a quasiexperimental study using zip code-level demographics and 30-day readmission rates for all medical and surgical discharges using Medicare claims data for 2008 through 2012. This interim analysis found that AF4Q was not associated with significant reductions in medical orsurgical readmissions, suggesting that AF4Q's multistakeholder approach was no more effective at reducing readmissions than other national efforts, such as the Hospital Reduction Program under the Affordable Care Act.
KW - Healthcare coalitions
KW - Hospital readmissions
KW - Quality improvement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010065659&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010065659&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000019
DO - 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000019
M3 - Article
C2 - 27153050
AN - SCOPUS:85010065659
SN - 1062-2551
VL - 38
SP - 396
EP - 407
JO - Journal for Healthcare Quality
JF - Journal for Healthcare Quality
IS - 6
ER -