Investigator bias and the PACE trial

Steven Lubet*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    6 Scopus citations


    The PACE investigators reject Geraghty's suggestion that the cognitive behavior therapy/graded exercise therapy trial could have been better left to researchers with no stake in the theories under study. The potential sources and standards for determining researcher bias are considered, concluding that the PACE investigators "impartiality might reasonably be questioned."

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1123-1127
    Number of pages5
    JournalJournal of Health Psychology
    Issue number9
    StatePublished - Aug 1 2017


    • chronic fatigue syndrome
    • cognitive behavior therapy
    • graded exercise therapy

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Applied Psychology

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Investigator bias and the PACE trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this