Investigator bias and the PACE trial

Steven Lubet*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The PACE investigators reject Geraghty's suggestion that the cognitive behavior therapy/graded exercise therapy trial could have been better left to researchers with no stake in the theories under study. The potential sources and standards for determining researcher bias are considered, concluding that the PACE investigators "impartiality might reasonably be questioned."

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1123-1127
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Health Psychology
Volume22
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

Research Personnel
Exercise Therapy
Cognitive Therapy

Keywords

  • chronic fatigue syndrome
  • cognitive behavior therapy
  • graded exercise therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

@article{206614c608d34e2cb4a9bcf702a44adf,
title = "Investigator bias and the PACE trial",
abstract = "The PACE investigators reject Geraghty's suggestion that the cognitive behavior therapy/graded exercise therapy trial could have been better left to researchers with no stake in the theories under study. The potential sources and standards for determining researcher bias are considered, concluding that the PACE investigators {"}impartiality might reasonably be questioned.{"}",
keywords = "chronic fatigue syndrome, cognitive behavior therapy, graded exercise therapy",
author = "Steven Lubet",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1359105317697324",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "1123--1127",
journal = "Journal of Health Psychology",
issn = "1359-1053",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "9",

}

Investigator bias and the PACE trial. / Lubet, Steven.

In: Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 22, No. 9, 01.08.2017, p. 1123-1127.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigator bias and the PACE trial

AU - Lubet, Steven

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - The PACE investigators reject Geraghty's suggestion that the cognitive behavior therapy/graded exercise therapy trial could have been better left to researchers with no stake in the theories under study. The potential sources and standards for determining researcher bias are considered, concluding that the PACE investigators "impartiality might reasonably be questioned."

AB - The PACE investigators reject Geraghty's suggestion that the cognitive behavior therapy/graded exercise therapy trial could have been better left to researchers with no stake in the theories under study. The potential sources and standards for determining researcher bias are considered, concluding that the PACE investigators "impartiality might reasonably be questioned."

KW - chronic fatigue syndrome

KW - cognitive behavior therapy

KW - graded exercise therapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026741849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026741849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1359105317697324

DO - 10.1177/1359105317697324

M3 - Review article

VL - 22

SP - 1123

EP - 1127

JO - Journal of Health Psychology

JF - Journal of Health Psychology

SN - 1359-1053

IS - 9

ER -