Investigator bias and the PACE trial

Steven Lubet

doi:10.1177/1359105317697324

Investigator bias and the PACE trial

Steven Lubet^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Pritzker School of Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

The PACE investigators reject Geraghty's suggestion that the cognitive behavior therapy/graded exercise therapy trial could have been better left to researchers with no stake in the theories under study. The potential sources and standards for determining researcher bias are considered, concluding that the PACE investigators "impartiality might reasonably be questioned."

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1123-1127
Number of pages	5
Journal	Journal of Health Psychology
Volume	22
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105317697324
State	Published - Aug 1 2017

Keywords

chronic fatigue syndrome
cognitive behavior therapy
graded exercise therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Applied Psychology

Access to Document

10.1177/1359105317697324

Cite this

@article{206614c608d34e2cb4a9bcf702a44adf,

title = "Investigator bias and the PACE trial",

abstract = "The PACE investigators reject Geraghty's suggestion that the cognitive behavior therapy/graded exercise therapy trial could have been better left to researchers with no stake in the theories under study. The potential sources and standards for determining researcher bias are considered, concluding that the PACE investigators {"}impartiality might reasonably be questioned.{"}",

keywords = "chronic fatigue syndrome, cognitive behavior therapy, graded exercise therapy",

author = "Steven Lubet",

year = "2017",

month = aug,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/1359105317697324",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "22",

pages = "1123--1127",

journal = "Journal of Health Psychology",

issn = "1359-1053",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigator bias and the PACE trial

AU - Lubet, Steven

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - The PACE investigators reject Geraghty's suggestion that the cognitive behavior therapy/graded exercise therapy trial could have been better left to researchers with no stake in the theories under study. The potential sources and standards for determining researcher bias are considered, concluding that the PACE investigators "impartiality might reasonably be questioned."

AB - The PACE investigators reject Geraghty's suggestion that the cognitive behavior therapy/graded exercise therapy trial could have been better left to researchers with no stake in the theories under study. The potential sources and standards for determining researcher bias are considered, concluding that the PACE investigators "impartiality might reasonably be questioned."

KW - chronic fatigue syndrome

KW - cognitive behavior therapy

KW - graded exercise therapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026741849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026741849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1359105317697324

DO - 10.1177/1359105317697324

M3 - Review article

C2 - 28805514

AN - SCOPUS:85026741849

SN - 1359-1053

VL - 22

SP - 1123

EP - 1127

JO - Journal of Health Psychology

JF - Journal of Health Psychology

IS - 9

ER -

Investigator bias and the PACE trial

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this