Investigator bias and the PACE trial

Steven Lubet*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations


The PACE investigators reject Geraghty's suggestion that the cognitive behavior therapy/graded exercise therapy trial could have been better left to researchers with no stake in the theories under study. The potential sources and standards for determining researcher bias are considered, concluding that the PACE investigators "impartiality might reasonably be questioned."

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1123-1127
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Health Psychology
Issue number9
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017


  • chronic fatigue syndrome
  • cognitive behavior therapy
  • graded exercise therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology


Dive into the research topics of 'Investigator bias and the PACE trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this