There is wide agreement that communities in lower-income countries should benefit when they participate in multinational research. Debate now focuses on how and to what extent these communities should benefit. This debate has identified compelling reasons to reject the claim that whatever benefits a community agrees to accept are necessarily fair. Yet, those who conduct clinical research may conclude from this rejection that there is no reason to involve communities in the process of deciding how they benefit. Against this possibility, the present manuscript argues that involving host communities in this process helps to promote four important goals: (1) protecting host communities, (2) respecting host communities, (3) promoting transparency, and (4) enhancing social value.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Number of pages||17|
|Journal||Journal of Medicine and Philosophy (United Kingdom)|
|State||Published - Oct 2015|
- clinical research
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects