Is bipartisanship dead? Policy agreement and agenda-setting in the house of representatives

Laurel Harbridge*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Book/ReportBook

43 Scopus citations

Abstract

Is Bipartisanship Dead? looks beyond (and considers the time before) roll call voting to examine the extent to which bipartisan agreement in the House of Representatives has declined since the 1970s. Despite voting coalitions showing a decline in bipartisan agreement between 1973 and 2004, member's bill cosponsorship coalitions show a much more stable level of bipartisanship. The declining bipartisanship over time in roll call voting reflects a shift in how party leaders structure the floor and roll call agendas. Party leaders in the House changed from prioritizing legislation with bipartisan agreement in the 1970s to prioritizing legislation with partisan disagreement by the 1990s. Laurel Harbridge argues that this shift reflects a changing political environment and an effort by leaders to balance members' electoral interests, governance goals, and partisan differentiation. The findings speak to questions of representation and governance. They also shed light on whether partisan conflict is insurmountable, and, ultimately, whether bipartisanship in congressional politics is dead.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Place of PublicationNew York, US
PublisherCambridge University Press
Number of pages258
ISBN (Electronic)9781139942324
ISBN (Print)9781107079953
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is bipartisanship dead? Policy agreement and agenda-setting in the house of representatives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this