TY - JOUR
T1 - Is body fat distribution associated with cardiovascular risk factors in childhood?
AU - Sangi, H.
AU - Mueller, W. H.
AU - Harrist, R. B.
AU - Rodriguez, B.
AU - Grunbaum, J. G.
AU - Labarthe, D. R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the Southwest Center for Prevention Research and funded by the centers for Disease Control no. 48/CCR 602176-01
PY - 1992
Y1 - 1992
N2 - The authors studied the association of cardiovascular risk variables with body fat distribution (BFD) in a cross-sectional sample of 743 Texas schoolchildren of both sexes ages 6-14 years. This association is well known in adults and several useful indices of BFD are available. Whether they are applicable to children remains a question of importance for epidemiological investigations in this age group. Canonical correlations between anthropometric (five skinfolds, four circumferences) and risk (blood pressures, cholesterol, pulse) variables ranged from 0·37 to 0·82 depending on sex/age group (p < 0·01). The skinfold vector suggested an association of risk with central fat at most but not all ages. The circumference vectors, on the other hand, suggest that size or fatness, not BFD, was related to risk. Partial correlation and stepwise regression of fatness and BFD indices with cardiovascular risk factors as dependent variables, showed that 'fatness' or 'size' was more clearly associated with risk factors than BFD. The variables most consistently entering the regression were hip circumference and sum of skinfolds. These results contrast with studies of adults or sexually mature adolescents, in which BFD is more clearly related to CV risk variables and the hip circumference is a 'low-risk' variable.
AB - The authors studied the association of cardiovascular risk variables with body fat distribution (BFD) in a cross-sectional sample of 743 Texas schoolchildren of both sexes ages 6-14 years. This association is well known in adults and several useful indices of BFD are available. Whether they are applicable to children remains a question of importance for epidemiological investigations in this age group. Canonical correlations between anthropometric (five skinfolds, four circumferences) and risk (blood pressures, cholesterol, pulse) variables ranged from 0·37 to 0·82 depending on sex/age group (p < 0·01). The skinfold vector suggested an association of risk with central fat at most but not all ages. The circumference vectors, on the other hand, suggest that size or fatness, not BFD, was related to risk. Partial correlation and stepwise regression of fatness and BFD indices with cardiovascular risk factors as dependent variables, showed that 'fatness' or 'size' was more clearly associated with risk factors than BFD. The variables most consistently entering the regression were hip circumference and sum of skinfolds. These results contrast with studies of adults or sexually mature adolescents, in which BFD is more clearly related to CV risk variables and the hip circumference is a 'low-risk' variable.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026949656&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026949656&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03014469200002382
DO - 10.1080/03014469200002382
M3 - Article
C2 - 1476412
AN - SCOPUS:0026949656
SN - 0301-4460
VL - 19
SP - 559
EP - 578
JO - Annals of Human Biology
JF - Annals of Human Biology
IS - 6
ER -