Is privacy policy language irrelevant to consumers?

Lior Jacob Strahilevitz, Matthew B. Kugler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article reports the results of two experiments in which large, census-weighted samples of Americans read short excerpts from Facebook’s, Yahoo’s, and Google’s privacy policies, which are at issue in high-stakes privacy class-action lawsuits. Subjects were randomly assigned to read language from either vague policies, some of which had been adjudicated insufficient to notify consumers about the companies’ practices, or explicit policies. Though many experimental subjects read these privacy policy excerpts closely, subjects who saw the explicit policies did not differ from those who saw vague policies in their assessment of whether their assent to the policies would permit the corporate practices at issue. Subjects generally stated that agreement to either vague or explicit language authorized companies to collect or use their personal information, even though consumers regarded these corporate practices as intrusive. These experiments show that courts and laypeople can understand the same privacy policy language quite differently.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S69-S95
JournalJournal of Legal Studies
Volume45
Issue numberS2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2016

Fingerprint

language policy
privacy
layperson
lawsuit
experiment
facebook
language
search engine
census

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

Strahilevitz, Lior Jacob ; Kugler, Matthew B. / Is privacy policy language irrelevant to consumers?. In: Journal of Legal Studies. 2016 ; Vol. 45, No. S2. pp. S69-S95.
@article{efd0771641204e20b017f31461b56ca8,
title = "Is privacy policy language irrelevant to consumers?",
abstract = "This article reports the results of two experiments in which large, census-weighted samples of Americans read short excerpts from Facebook’s, Yahoo’s, and Google’s privacy policies, which are at issue in high-stakes privacy class-action lawsuits. Subjects were randomly assigned to read language from either vague policies, some of which had been adjudicated insufficient to notify consumers about the companies’ practices, or explicit policies. Though many experimental subjects read these privacy policy excerpts closely, subjects who saw the explicit policies did not differ from those who saw vague policies in their assessment of whether their assent to the policies would permit the corporate practices at issue. Subjects generally stated that agreement to either vague or explicit language authorized companies to collect or use their personal information, even though consumers regarded these corporate practices as intrusive. These experiments show that courts and laypeople can understand the same privacy policy language quite differently.",
author = "Strahilevitz, {Lior Jacob} and Kugler, {Matthew B.}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1086/689933",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "S69--S95",
journal = "Journal of Legal Studies",
issn = "0047-2530",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "S2",

}

Is privacy policy language irrelevant to consumers? / Strahilevitz, Lior Jacob; Kugler, Matthew B.

In: Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 45, No. S2, 06.2016, p. S69-S95.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is privacy policy language irrelevant to consumers?

AU - Strahilevitz, Lior Jacob

AU - Kugler, Matthew B.

PY - 2016/6

Y1 - 2016/6

N2 - This article reports the results of two experiments in which large, census-weighted samples of Americans read short excerpts from Facebook’s, Yahoo’s, and Google’s privacy policies, which are at issue in high-stakes privacy class-action lawsuits. Subjects were randomly assigned to read language from either vague policies, some of which had been adjudicated insufficient to notify consumers about the companies’ practices, or explicit policies. Though many experimental subjects read these privacy policy excerpts closely, subjects who saw the explicit policies did not differ from those who saw vague policies in their assessment of whether their assent to the policies would permit the corporate practices at issue. Subjects generally stated that agreement to either vague or explicit language authorized companies to collect or use their personal information, even though consumers regarded these corporate practices as intrusive. These experiments show that courts and laypeople can understand the same privacy policy language quite differently.

AB - This article reports the results of two experiments in which large, census-weighted samples of Americans read short excerpts from Facebook’s, Yahoo’s, and Google’s privacy policies, which are at issue in high-stakes privacy class-action lawsuits. Subjects were randomly assigned to read language from either vague policies, some of which had been adjudicated insufficient to notify consumers about the companies’ practices, or explicit policies. Though many experimental subjects read these privacy policy excerpts closely, subjects who saw the explicit policies did not differ from those who saw vague policies in their assessment of whether their assent to the policies would permit the corporate practices at issue. Subjects generally stated that agreement to either vague or explicit language authorized companies to collect or use their personal information, even though consumers regarded these corporate practices as intrusive. These experiments show that courts and laypeople can understand the same privacy policy language quite differently.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006833181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006833181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/689933

DO - 10.1086/689933

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85006833181

VL - 45

SP - S69-S95

JO - Journal of Legal Studies

JF - Journal of Legal Studies

SN - 0047-2530

IS - S2

ER -