Is test security a concern when OSCE stations are repeated across clerkship rotations?

Amy H. Niehaus*, Debra A. DaRosa, Stephen J. Markwell, Roland Folse

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose. To examine the issue of test security when the same stations on an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) are repeated across clerkship rotations. Specifically, is there a significant difference in students' scores on stations repeated in three or four rotations within a single academic year? Method. The sample consisted of 15 stations in the OSCE given at the end of the third-year surgery clerkship at the Southern Illinois University School of Medicine from 1989-90 through 1993-94. Each station was administered three or four times a year. One-way analyses of variance with contrast coding to test for linear trends were used. Results were considered significant at or below the .05 level. Results. Only three of the 15 stations showed significant linear trends. A two-part couplet orthopedic station showed a significant decreasing linear trend (p = .0001). Two stations showed significant increasing linear trends: a general surgery couplet station (p = .0004) and a plastic surgery station with an essay question (p = .0253). Conclusion. There was no consistent evidence that students scored increasingly higher on OSCE stations repeated throughout the year. Thus, it would appear that a clerkship can repeat OSCE stations within an academic year without risk of a trend toward increasing scores.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)287-289
Number of pages3
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume71
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1996

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is test security a concern when OSCE stations are repeated across clerkship rotations?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this