It works both ways: Transfer difficulties between manipulatives and written subtraction solutions

David H Uttal, Meredith Amayo, Maria del Rosario Mata, Linda Liu Hand, Cheryl Ann Cohen, Katherine O'Doherty, Judy S DeLoache

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Three experiments compared performance and transfer among children aged 83–94 months after written or manipulatives instruction on two-digit subtraction. In Experiment 1a, children learned with manipulatives or with traditional written numerals. All children then completed a written posttest. Experiment 1b investigated whether salient or perceptually attractive manipulatives affected transfer. Experiment 2 investigated whether instruction with writing would transfer to a manipulatives-based posttest. Children demonstrated performance gains when the posttest format was identical to the instructed format but failed to demonstrate transfer from the instructed format to an incongruent posttest. The results indicate that the problem in transferring from manipulatives instruction to written assessments stems from a general difficulty in using knowledge gained in one format (e.g., manipulatives) in another format (e.g., writing). Taken together, the results have important implications for research and teaching in early mathematics. Teachers should consider making specific links and alignments between written and manipulatives-based representations of the same problems.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number216367
Number of pages13
JournalChild Development Research
StatePublished - 2013


Dive into the research topics of 'It works both ways: Transfer difficulties between manipulatives and written subtraction solutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this