Ivory tower meets smoke-filled back rooms of politics: An academic perspective on illinois’ school funding debate

Stephen T. Mark, Therese J. McGuire, David F. Merriman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In anticipation of an upcoming legislative debate, in the early summer of 1996 public advocacy groups in Illinois contracted with the Institute of Government and Public Affairs of the University of Illinois to provide analysis of school funding reform proposals. The intent was to make the analysis and models widely available for use by government officials as well as concerned citizens. We prepared a report on options for Illinois to help focus the school funding discussion on the fundamental policy choices facing lawmakers. In this article, we summarize the process of and the university’s contribution to the policy debate. Five illustrative alternatives to the current system are analyzed. While we think these options are of interest for their own sake, our primary goal in writing this article is to provide an example of how academic analysts can make a constructive contribution to heated political debate without advocating any particular plan.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-35
Number of pages14
JournalPublic Budgeting and Finance
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Public Administration

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Ivory tower meets smoke-filled back rooms of politics: An academic perspective on illinois’ school funding debate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this