Journalism as reason-giving: Deliberative democracy, institutional accountability, and the news media's mission

James S. Ettema*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Offering reasons for public choice is the central act of deliberative democracy. These reasons, however, must meet a stern criterion; they must be grounded in principles that cannot be reasonably rejected by citizens seeking fair terms of cooperation. Because reasons given in actual political argument regularly fail to meet this criterion, journalism should be asked to participate not merely by presiding over an uncritical forum for reason-giving but by acting as a reasoning institution that aggressively pursues and compellingly renders reasons satisfying the criterion. Moreover, because deliberation must be regulated by procedural principles that include mutual accountability, journalism should be asked to participate by demanding the accountability of public institutions to citizens, each other, and most importantly the ideals of the polity. A case study of journalism demanding accountability to the ideals of justice - one newspaper's campaign for death penalty reform - provides a constructive model of journalistic reason-giving in a situation of deep moral disagreement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)143-160
Number of pages18
JournalPolitical Communication
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2007

Fingerprint

deliberative democracy
journalism
news
responsibility
citizen
death penalty
public choice
public institution
deliberation
newspaper
campaign
justice
reform

Keywords

  • Accountability
  • Death penalty reform
  • Deliberative democracy
  • Editorials
  • Investigative journalism
  • Public moral argument
  • Reciprocity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{918cff5ad0674ee6b94bea0602eb4ad6,
title = "Journalism as reason-giving: Deliberative democracy, institutional accountability, and the news media's mission",
abstract = "Offering reasons for public choice is the central act of deliberative democracy. These reasons, however, must meet a stern criterion; they must be grounded in principles that cannot be reasonably rejected by citizens seeking fair terms of cooperation. Because reasons given in actual political argument regularly fail to meet this criterion, journalism should be asked to participate not merely by presiding over an uncritical forum for reason-giving but by acting as a reasoning institution that aggressively pursues and compellingly renders reasons satisfying the criterion. Moreover, because deliberation must be regulated by procedural principles that include mutual accountability, journalism should be asked to participate by demanding the accountability of public institutions to citizens, each other, and most importantly the ideals of the polity. A case study of journalism demanding accountability to the ideals of justice - one newspaper's campaign for death penalty reform - provides a constructive model of journalistic reason-giving in a situation of deep moral disagreement.",
keywords = "Accountability, Death penalty reform, Deliberative democracy, Editorials, Investigative journalism, Public moral argument, Reciprocity",
author = "Ettema, {James S.}",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10584600701312860",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "143--160",
journal = "Political Communication",
issn = "1058-4609",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Journalism as reason-giving

T2 - Deliberative democracy, institutional accountability, and the news media's mission

AU - Ettema, James S.

PY - 2007/4/1

Y1 - 2007/4/1

N2 - Offering reasons for public choice is the central act of deliberative democracy. These reasons, however, must meet a stern criterion; they must be grounded in principles that cannot be reasonably rejected by citizens seeking fair terms of cooperation. Because reasons given in actual political argument regularly fail to meet this criterion, journalism should be asked to participate not merely by presiding over an uncritical forum for reason-giving but by acting as a reasoning institution that aggressively pursues and compellingly renders reasons satisfying the criterion. Moreover, because deliberation must be regulated by procedural principles that include mutual accountability, journalism should be asked to participate by demanding the accountability of public institutions to citizens, each other, and most importantly the ideals of the polity. A case study of journalism demanding accountability to the ideals of justice - one newspaper's campaign for death penalty reform - provides a constructive model of journalistic reason-giving in a situation of deep moral disagreement.

AB - Offering reasons for public choice is the central act of deliberative democracy. These reasons, however, must meet a stern criterion; they must be grounded in principles that cannot be reasonably rejected by citizens seeking fair terms of cooperation. Because reasons given in actual political argument regularly fail to meet this criterion, journalism should be asked to participate not merely by presiding over an uncritical forum for reason-giving but by acting as a reasoning institution that aggressively pursues and compellingly renders reasons satisfying the criterion. Moreover, because deliberation must be regulated by procedural principles that include mutual accountability, journalism should be asked to participate by demanding the accountability of public institutions to citizens, each other, and most importantly the ideals of the polity. A case study of journalism demanding accountability to the ideals of justice - one newspaper's campaign for death penalty reform - provides a constructive model of journalistic reason-giving in a situation of deep moral disagreement.

KW - Accountability

KW - Death penalty reform

KW - Deliberative democracy

KW - Editorials

KW - Investigative journalism

KW - Public moral argument

KW - Reciprocity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249071035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249071035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10584600701312860

DO - 10.1080/10584600701312860

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34249071035

VL - 24

SP - 143

EP - 160

JO - Political Communication

JF - Political Communication

SN - 1058-4609

IS - 2

ER -