Judging sex

Deborah Tuerkheimer*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

This Article explores the curious jurisprudence of sexual patterns and how it constructs female sexuality. In modern rape law, the "unchaste character inference" expressly prohibited by the rape shield endures. Though the boundaries that circumscribe appropriate sexual conduct have shifted over time, courts persist in making normative judgments about women's sexuality. Cloaked in the legitimizing rhetoric of sexual patterns, retrograde notions of deviancy are substituting for rational deliberation on the question of consent. As rape shield law enters its fourth decade, it continues to defy reason, both in application and in theory. The proposed evidentiary approach promises to improve judicial decision making in rape cases, while reorienting the law toward the female sexual subject and the contingency of her consent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1461-1504
Number of pages44
JournalCornell Law Review
Volume97
Issue number6
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Judging sex'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Tuerkheimer, D. (2012). Judging sex. Cornell Law Review, 97(6), 1461-1504.