Judiciary rising

Constitutional change in the United Kingdom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Britain is experiencing a period of dramatic change that challenges centuries-old understandings of British constitutionalism. In the past fifteen years, the British Parliament enacted a quasi-constitutional bill of rights; devolved legislative power to Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland; and created a new Supreme Court. British academics debate how each element of this transformation can be best understood: is it consistent with political constitutionalism and historic notions of parliamentary sovereignty, or does it usher in a new regime that places external, rule-oflaw- based limits on Parliament? Much of this commentary examines these changes in a piecemeal fashion, failing to account for the systemic factors at play in the British system. This Article assesses the cumulative force of the many recent constitutional changes, shedding new light on the changing nature of the British constitution. Drawing on the U.S. literature on federalism and judicial power, the Article illuminates the role of human rights and devolution in the growing influence of the U.K. Supreme Court. Whether a rising judiciary will truly challenge British notions of parliamentary sovereignty is as yet unknown, but scholars and politicians should pay close attention to the groundwork being laid.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)543-605
Number of pages63
JournalNorthwestern University law review
Volume108
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

constitutionalism
judiciary
parliament
sovereignty
Supreme Court
judicial power
federalism
bill
decentralization
politician
constitution
human rights
regime
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

@article{c24e8ab177f741f485c3102cca3fbd49,
title = "Judiciary rising: Constitutional change in the United Kingdom",
abstract = "Britain is experiencing a period of dramatic change that challenges centuries-old understandings of British constitutionalism. In the past fifteen years, the British Parliament enacted a quasi-constitutional bill of rights; devolved legislative power to Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland; and created a new Supreme Court. British academics debate how each element of this transformation can be best understood: is it consistent with political constitutionalism and historic notions of parliamentary sovereignty, or does it usher in a new regime that places external, rule-oflaw- based limits on Parliament? Much of this commentary examines these changes in a piecemeal fashion, failing to account for the systemic factors at play in the British system. This Article assesses the cumulative force of the many recent constitutional changes, shedding new light on the changing nature of the British constitution. Drawing on the U.S. literature on federalism and judicial power, the Article illuminates the role of human rights and devolution in the growing influence of the U.K. Supreme Court. Whether a rising judiciary will truly challenge British notions of parliamentary sovereignty is as yet unknown, but scholars and politicians should pay close attention to the groundwork being laid.",
author = "Delaney, {Erin F}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "108",
pages = "543--605",
journal = "Northwestern University Law Review",
issn = "0029-3571",
publisher = "University of Illinois Press",
number = "2",

}

Judiciary rising : Constitutional change in the United Kingdom. / Delaney, Erin F.

In: Northwestern University law review, Vol. 108, No. 2, 01.01.2014, p. 543-605.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Judiciary rising

T2 - Constitutional change in the United Kingdom

AU - Delaney, Erin F

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Britain is experiencing a period of dramatic change that challenges centuries-old understandings of British constitutionalism. In the past fifteen years, the British Parliament enacted a quasi-constitutional bill of rights; devolved legislative power to Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland; and created a new Supreme Court. British academics debate how each element of this transformation can be best understood: is it consistent with political constitutionalism and historic notions of parliamentary sovereignty, or does it usher in a new regime that places external, rule-oflaw- based limits on Parliament? Much of this commentary examines these changes in a piecemeal fashion, failing to account for the systemic factors at play in the British system. This Article assesses the cumulative force of the many recent constitutional changes, shedding new light on the changing nature of the British constitution. Drawing on the U.S. literature on federalism and judicial power, the Article illuminates the role of human rights and devolution in the growing influence of the U.K. Supreme Court. Whether a rising judiciary will truly challenge British notions of parliamentary sovereignty is as yet unknown, but scholars and politicians should pay close attention to the groundwork being laid.

AB - Britain is experiencing a period of dramatic change that challenges centuries-old understandings of British constitutionalism. In the past fifteen years, the British Parliament enacted a quasi-constitutional bill of rights; devolved legislative power to Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland; and created a new Supreme Court. British academics debate how each element of this transformation can be best understood: is it consistent with political constitutionalism and historic notions of parliamentary sovereignty, or does it usher in a new regime that places external, rule-oflaw- based limits on Parliament? Much of this commentary examines these changes in a piecemeal fashion, failing to account for the systemic factors at play in the British system. This Article assesses the cumulative force of the many recent constitutional changes, shedding new light on the changing nature of the British constitution. Drawing on the U.S. literature on federalism and judicial power, the Article illuminates the role of human rights and devolution in the growing influence of the U.K. Supreme Court. Whether a rising judiciary will truly challenge British notions of parliamentary sovereignty is as yet unknown, but scholars and politicians should pay close attention to the groundwork being laid.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901371531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901371531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 108

SP - 543

EP - 605

JO - Northwestern University Law Review

JF - Northwestern University Law Review

SN - 0029-3571

IS - 2

ER -