Abstract
Centralized water infrastructure is challenged by climate change, infrastructure degradation, underinvestment, and shifting water demands. In its place, scholars have argued for “Modular, Adaptive and Decentralized” (MAD) water systems. We critically interrogate the environmental injustices that produce, and may be reproduced through, MAD water systems. We focus on two key dynamics by which MAD systems emerge: “shoving-out” of, and “opting-out” from, centralized water systems. Using a justice-based framework, we synthesize three cases from Texas, California, and North Carolina, each illustrating how racial and socio-economic marginalization produce MAD water systems. We argue that identifying the structural and relational forces that drive “shove-out” and “opt-out” dynamics remains key for theorizing the enactment of MAD water systems.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 100151 |
Journal | Water Security |
Volume | 20 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 2023 |
Funding
This research was funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation under awards NSF GCR-2021147, NSF EEC 1449500, NSF BCS-1759972; the University of Waterloo (TD Walter Bean Professorship); the JPB Foundation; and JobsOhio (SFPN_2020_486365-NAR). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the funders.
Keywords
- Environmental justice
- MAD (Modular, Adaptive, and Decentralized) water
- Poverty
- Race
- Water justice
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Oceanography
- Water Science and Technology
- Waste Management and Disposal
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law