Juvenile-sex-offender registration: An impermissible life sentence

Robin Walker Sterling*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

In a recent series of cases, the US Supreme Court has recognized that "children are different" from adults, concluding that these differences must inform how we treat children accused of serious crimes. If "children are different" when they are charged with homicide and face a possible sentence of life without parole, they are also "different" when they are charged with sex offenses and face the possibility of mandatory lifetime sex-offender registration. The same principles that have led the Court to categorically exempt youths from the death penalty, life without parole for nonhomicide crimes, and mandatory life-without-parole sentences should lead to the abolition of mandatory lifetime juvenile-sex-offender registration. This Essay argues that the Court's reasoning and analysis in recent juvenile-justice cases indicate that mandatory lifetime juvenile-sex-offender registration is ripe for successful challenge.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)295-315
Number of pages21
JournalUniversity of Chicago Law Review
Volume82
Issue number1
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Juvenile-sex-offender registration: An impermissible life sentence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this