Abstract
A widely accepted view in recent work in epistemology is that knowledge is a cognitive achievement that is properly creditable to those subjects who possess it. More precisely, according to the Credit View of Knowledge, if S knows that p, then S deserves credit for truly believing that p. In spite of its intuitive appeal and explanatory power, I have elsewhere argued that the Credit View is false. Various responses have been offered to my argument and I here consider each of these objections in turn. I show that none succeeds in undermining my argument and, thus, my original conclusion stands-the Credit View of Knowledge is false.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 27-42 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Philosophical Studies |
Volume | 142 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 2009 |
Keywords
- Credit
- Credit View of Knowledge
- Gettier cases
- Knowledge
- Testimony
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy