Knowledge Translation of the American College of Emergency Physicians Clinical Policy on Hypertension

Jill F. Lehrmann*, Paula Tanabe, Brigitte M. Baumann, Molly K. Jones, Zoran Martinovich, James G Adams

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To determine if dissemination of the American College of Emergency Physicians clinical policy on hypertension to emergency physicians would lead to improvements in blood pressure reassessment and referral of emergency department (ED) patients with elevated blood pressure. Methods: Two academic centers implemented a pre-post intervention design, with independent samples at pre and post phases. ED staff were blinded to the investigation. A total of 377 medical records were reviewed before policy dissemination and 402 were reviewed after policy dissemination. Medical records were eligible for review if the patient was at least 18 years of age, was not pregnant, was discharged from the ED, and had a triage systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg. Patient records with a chief complaint of chest pain, shortness of breath, or neurologic complaints were excluded. Demographics, blood pressures, and evidence of discharge referral were abstracted from the medical record. The policy was disseminated after the initial medical record review. Post-policy dissemination medical record review was conducted within two weeks. Results: A total of 779 medical records were reviewed. The mean age of patients was 45 years, 55% were male, and 46% were white, 13% Hispanic, 35% African American, and 6% other. No differences in reassessment or referral rates were found between study phases. Blood pressure reassessments were low during both phases: 33% (pre) and 37% (post). Referral rates of patients with elevated blood pressure were very low: 13% (pre) and 7% (post). Conclusions: Knowledge of guidelines did not translate into changes in physician practice. Additional systems-based approaches are necessary to effectively translate guidelines into clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1090-1096
Number of pages7
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume14
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2007

Fingerprint

Translational Medical Research
Blood Pressure
Hypertension
Medical Records
Referral and Consultation
Hospital Emergency Service
Guidelines
Physicians
Triage
Chest Pain
Hispanic Americans
African Americans
Dyspnea
Nervous System
Emergencies
Demography

Keywords

  • emergency department
  • guidelines
  • hypertension
  • knowledge translation
  • policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Lehrmann, Jill F. ; Tanabe, Paula ; Baumann, Brigitte M. ; Jones, Molly K. ; Martinovich, Zoran ; Adams, James G. / Knowledge Translation of the American College of Emergency Physicians Clinical Policy on Hypertension. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 14, No. 11. pp. 1090-1096.
@article{daa1924b00b945dab5da780ede2746e9,
title = "Knowledge Translation of the American College of Emergency Physicians Clinical Policy on Hypertension",
abstract = "Objectives: To determine if dissemination of the American College of Emergency Physicians clinical policy on hypertension to emergency physicians would lead to improvements in blood pressure reassessment and referral of emergency department (ED) patients with elevated blood pressure. Methods: Two academic centers implemented a pre-post intervention design, with independent samples at pre and post phases. ED staff were blinded to the investigation. A total of 377 medical records were reviewed before policy dissemination and 402 were reviewed after policy dissemination. Medical records were eligible for review if the patient was at least 18 years of age, was not pregnant, was discharged from the ED, and had a triage systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg. Patient records with a chief complaint of chest pain, shortness of breath, or neurologic complaints were excluded. Demographics, blood pressures, and evidence of discharge referral were abstracted from the medical record. The policy was disseminated after the initial medical record review. Post-policy dissemination medical record review was conducted within two weeks. Results: A total of 779 medical records were reviewed. The mean age of patients was 45 years, 55{\%} were male, and 46{\%} were white, 13{\%} Hispanic, 35{\%} African American, and 6{\%} other. No differences in reassessment or referral rates were found between study phases. Blood pressure reassessments were low during both phases: 33{\%} (pre) and 37{\%} (post). Referral rates of patients with elevated blood pressure were very low: 13{\%} (pre) and 7{\%} (post). Conclusions: Knowledge of guidelines did not translate into changes in physician practice. Additional systems-based approaches are necessary to effectively translate guidelines into clinical practice.",
keywords = "emergency department, guidelines, hypertension, knowledge translation, policy",
author = "Lehrmann, {Jill F.} and Paula Tanabe and Baumann, {Brigitte M.} and Jones, {Molly K.} and Zoran Martinovich and Adams, {James G}",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1197/j.aem.2007.05.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "1090--1096",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

Knowledge Translation of the American College of Emergency Physicians Clinical Policy on Hypertension. / Lehrmann, Jill F.; Tanabe, Paula; Baumann, Brigitte M.; Jones, Molly K.; Martinovich, Zoran; Adams, James G.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 11, 01.11.2007, p. 1090-1096.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge Translation of the American College of Emergency Physicians Clinical Policy on Hypertension

AU - Lehrmann, Jill F.

AU - Tanabe, Paula

AU - Baumann, Brigitte M.

AU - Jones, Molly K.

AU - Martinovich, Zoran

AU - Adams, James G

PY - 2007/11/1

Y1 - 2007/11/1

N2 - Objectives: To determine if dissemination of the American College of Emergency Physicians clinical policy on hypertension to emergency physicians would lead to improvements in blood pressure reassessment and referral of emergency department (ED) patients with elevated blood pressure. Methods: Two academic centers implemented a pre-post intervention design, with independent samples at pre and post phases. ED staff were blinded to the investigation. A total of 377 medical records were reviewed before policy dissemination and 402 were reviewed after policy dissemination. Medical records were eligible for review if the patient was at least 18 years of age, was not pregnant, was discharged from the ED, and had a triage systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg. Patient records with a chief complaint of chest pain, shortness of breath, or neurologic complaints were excluded. Demographics, blood pressures, and evidence of discharge referral were abstracted from the medical record. The policy was disseminated after the initial medical record review. Post-policy dissemination medical record review was conducted within two weeks. Results: A total of 779 medical records were reviewed. The mean age of patients was 45 years, 55% were male, and 46% were white, 13% Hispanic, 35% African American, and 6% other. No differences in reassessment or referral rates were found between study phases. Blood pressure reassessments were low during both phases: 33% (pre) and 37% (post). Referral rates of patients with elevated blood pressure were very low: 13% (pre) and 7% (post). Conclusions: Knowledge of guidelines did not translate into changes in physician practice. Additional systems-based approaches are necessary to effectively translate guidelines into clinical practice.

AB - Objectives: To determine if dissemination of the American College of Emergency Physicians clinical policy on hypertension to emergency physicians would lead to improvements in blood pressure reassessment and referral of emergency department (ED) patients with elevated blood pressure. Methods: Two academic centers implemented a pre-post intervention design, with independent samples at pre and post phases. ED staff were blinded to the investigation. A total of 377 medical records were reviewed before policy dissemination and 402 were reviewed after policy dissemination. Medical records were eligible for review if the patient was at least 18 years of age, was not pregnant, was discharged from the ED, and had a triage systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg. Patient records with a chief complaint of chest pain, shortness of breath, or neurologic complaints were excluded. Demographics, blood pressures, and evidence of discharge referral were abstracted from the medical record. The policy was disseminated after the initial medical record review. Post-policy dissemination medical record review was conducted within two weeks. Results: A total of 779 medical records were reviewed. The mean age of patients was 45 years, 55% were male, and 46% were white, 13% Hispanic, 35% African American, and 6% other. No differences in reassessment or referral rates were found between study phases. Blood pressure reassessments were low during both phases: 33% (pre) and 37% (post). Referral rates of patients with elevated blood pressure were very low: 13% (pre) and 7% (post). Conclusions: Knowledge of guidelines did not translate into changes in physician practice. Additional systems-based approaches are necessary to effectively translate guidelines into clinical practice.

KW - emergency department

KW - guidelines

KW - hypertension

KW - knowledge translation

KW - policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35448993914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35448993914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/j.aem.2007.05.016

DO - 10.1197/j.aem.2007.05.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 17898244

AN - SCOPUS:35448993914

VL - 14

SP - 1090

EP - 1096

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 11

ER -