Laparoscopic morcellator-related injuries

Magdy P. Milad*, Eric Sokol

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations


Study Objective. To identify and summarize all electric morcellator-related injuries published in the medical literature. Design. Systematic review (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting. Databases. Subjects. Articles on morcellator-related injuries published from 1992 through February 2002, plus additional sources of information. Intervention. Search of MEDLINE and referencing of the FDA device report database. Measurements and Main Results. We were unable to locate any references to morcellator-related visceral injuries in the medical literature. Of 17 cases identified from the FDA database, 3 were excluded based on the trivial nature of the event (e.g., instrument did not function). The remaining 14 visceral injuries were to small and large bowel (11), kidney (2), pancreas (1), and major vascular structures (3). Identification of the complication was immediate in 10 patients, but was not until 4 days postoperatively in 1 woman. Three patients died. No device manufacturer or surgical specialty was responsible for a preponderance of the injuries. Conclusion. These potentially fatal complications are unreported in the medical literature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)383-385
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
Issue number3
StatePublished - Aug 2003

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology


Dive into the research topics of 'Laparoscopic morcellator-related injuries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this