Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and management of the distal ureter: A review of current techniques and outcomes

Robert B. Nadler, Davis P. Viprakasit, Amanda M. MacEjko

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) is becoming an increasingly common alternative treatment for transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the renal pelvis and ureter due to decreased perioperative morbidity, shorter hospitalization, and comparable oncologic control with open nephroureterectomy (ONU). Mobilization of the kidney and proximal ureter may be performed through a transperitoneal, retroperitoneal, or hand-assisted approach. Each technique is associated with its own benefits and limitations, and the optimal approach is often dictated by surgeon preference. Our analysis of the literature reflects equivalent cancer control between LPN and OPN at intermediate follow-up with significantly improved perioperative morbidity following LPN. Several methods for bladder cuff excision have been advocated, however, no individual technique for management of the distal ureter proved superior. Overall, complete en-bloc resection with minimal disruption of the urinary tract should be optimized to maintain oncologic outcomes. Longer follow-up and prospective studies are needed to fully evaluate these techniques.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number721371
JournalAdvances in Urology
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and management of the distal ureter: A review of current techniques and outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this