TY - GEN
T1 - Large-scale student projects - Problematic or preparatory for careers in engineering management?
AU - Thompson, Charles W.N.
PY - 2006/12/1
Y1 - 2006/12/1
N2 - Long before Sputnik pushed engineering schools into liberal science priorities, engineering (and business) curricula used individual and small group projects as a vehicle for teaching the disciplinary syllabus (and preparing students for the world of work where both engineering and management positions would require skills above and beyond basic technical education). In recent years, the insistence of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) on real world projects and industry's growing dependence on project teams (as distinguished from functional organizations) has reinforced the practice of using real (as distinguished from laboratory) projects. Large-scale student real world projects are far less common than individual or small group projects. The reasons for this may include the large cost in instructor's time, the difficulty in recruiting clients, and the difficulty in evaluating student groups. The experience of the author and of others will be drawn upon to examine these reasons and other advantages and disadvantages.
AB - Long before Sputnik pushed engineering schools into liberal science priorities, engineering (and business) curricula used individual and small group projects as a vehicle for teaching the disciplinary syllabus (and preparing students for the world of work where both engineering and management positions would require skills above and beyond basic technical education). In recent years, the insistence of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) on real world projects and industry's growing dependence on project teams (as distinguished from functional organizations) has reinforced the practice of using real (as distinguished from laboratory) projects. Large-scale student real world projects are far less common than individual or small group projects. The reasons for this may include the large cost in instructor's time, the difficulty in recruiting clients, and the difficulty in evaluating student groups. The experience of the author and of others will be drawn upon to examine these reasons and other advantages and disadvantages.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879830225&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879830225&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84879830225
SN - 9781604237146
T3 - 27th Annual National Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management 2006 - Managing Change: Managing People and Technology in a Rapidly Changing World, ASEM 2006
SP - 327
EP - 334
BT - 27th Annual National Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management 2006 - Managing Change
T2 - 27th Annual National Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management 2006 - Managing Change: Managing People and Technology in a Rapidly Changing World, ASEM 2006
Y2 - 25 October 2006 through 28 October 2006
ER -