Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology

Lingfei Wu, Dashun Wang, James A. Evans*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One of the most universal trends in science and technology today is the growth of large teams in all areas, as solitary researchers and small teams diminish in prevalence 1–3 . Increases in team size have been attributed to the specialization of scientific activities 3 , improvements in communication technology 4,5 , or the complexity of modern problems that require interdisciplinary solutions 6–8 . This shift in team size raises the question of whether and how the character of the science and technology produced by large teams differs from that of small teams. Here we analyse more than 65 million papers, patents and software products that span the period 1954–2014, and demonstrate that across this period smaller teams have tended to disrupt science and technology with new ideas and opportunities, whereas larger teams have tended to develop existing ones. Work from larger teams builds on more-recent and popular developments, and attention to their work comes immediately. By contrast, contributions by smaller teams search more deeply into the past, are viewed as disruptive to science and technology and succeed further into the future—if at all. Observed differences between small and large teams are magnified for higher-impact work, with small teams known for disruptive work and large teams for developing work. Differences in topic and research design account for a small part of the relationship between team size and disruption; most of the effect occurs at the level of the individual, as people move between smaller and larger teams. These results demonstrate that both small and large teams are essential to a flourishing ecology of science and technology, and suggest that, to achieve this, science policies should aim to support a diversity of team sizes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)378-382
Number of pages5
JournalNature
Volume566
Issue number7744
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 21 2019

Fingerprint

Technology
Patents
Ecology
Research Design
Software
Research Personnel
Growth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Wu, Lingfei ; Wang, Dashun ; Evans, James A. / Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. In: Nature. 2019 ; Vol. 566, No. 7744. pp. 378-382.
@article{8d00934114bd4348aa938f688c67090d,
title = "Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology",
abstract = "One of the most universal trends in science and technology today is the growth of large teams in all areas, as solitary researchers and small teams diminish in prevalence 1–3 . Increases in team size have been attributed to the specialization of scientific activities 3 , improvements in communication technology 4,5 , or the complexity of modern problems that require interdisciplinary solutions 6–8 . This shift in team size raises the question of whether and how the character of the science and technology produced by large teams differs from that of small teams. Here we analyse more than 65 million papers, patents and software products that span the period 1954–2014, and demonstrate that across this period smaller teams have tended to disrupt science and technology with new ideas and opportunities, whereas larger teams have tended to develop existing ones. Work from larger teams builds on more-recent and popular developments, and attention to their work comes immediately. By contrast, contributions by smaller teams search more deeply into the past, are viewed as disruptive to science and technology and succeed further into the future—if at all. Observed differences between small and large teams are magnified for higher-impact work, with small teams known for disruptive work and large teams for developing work. Differences in topic and research design account for a small part of the relationship between team size and disruption; most of the effect occurs at the level of the individual, as people move between smaller and larger teams. These results demonstrate that both small and large teams are essential to a flourishing ecology of science and technology, and suggest that, to achieve this, science policies should aim to support a diversity of team sizes.",
author = "Lingfei Wu and Dashun Wang and Evans, {James A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "566",
pages = "378--382",
journal = "Nature",
issn = "0028-0836",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "7744",

}

Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. / Wu, Lingfei; Wang, Dashun; Evans, James A.

In: Nature, Vol. 566, No. 7744, 21.02.2019, p. 378-382.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

TY - JOUR

T1 - Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology

AU - Wu, Lingfei

AU - Wang, Dashun

AU - Evans, James A.

PY - 2019/2/21

Y1 - 2019/2/21

N2 - One of the most universal trends in science and technology today is the growth of large teams in all areas, as solitary researchers and small teams diminish in prevalence 1–3 . Increases in team size have been attributed to the specialization of scientific activities 3 , improvements in communication technology 4,5 , or the complexity of modern problems that require interdisciplinary solutions 6–8 . This shift in team size raises the question of whether and how the character of the science and technology produced by large teams differs from that of small teams. Here we analyse more than 65 million papers, patents and software products that span the period 1954–2014, and demonstrate that across this period smaller teams have tended to disrupt science and technology with new ideas and opportunities, whereas larger teams have tended to develop existing ones. Work from larger teams builds on more-recent and popular developments, and attention to their work comes immediately. By contrast, contributions by smaller teams search more deeply into the past, are viewed as disruptive to science and technology and succeed further into the future—if at all. Observed differences between small and large teams are magnified for higher-impact work, with small teams known for disruptive work and large teams for developing work. Differences in topic and research design account for a small part of the relationship between team size and disruption; most of the effect occurs at the level of the individual, as people move between smaller and larger teams. These results demonstrate that both small and large teams are essential to a flourishing ecology of science and technology, and suggest that, to achieve this, science policies should aim to support a diversity of team sizes.

AB - One of the most universal trends in science and technology today is the growth of large teams in all areas, as solitary researchers and small teams diminish in prevalence 1–3 . Increases in team size have been attributed to the specialization of scientific activities 3 , improvements in communication technology 4,5 , or the complexity of modern problems that require interdisciplinary solutions 6–8 . This shift in team size raises the question of whether and how the character of the science and technology produced by large teams differs from that of small teams. Here we analyse more than 65 million papers, patents and software products that span the period 1954–2014, and demonstrate that across this period smaller teams have tended to disrupt science and technology with new ideas and opportunities, whereas larger teams have tended to develop existing ones. Work from larger teams builds on more-recent and popular developments, and attention to their work comes immediately. By contrast, contributions by smaller teams search more deeply into the past, are viewed as disruptive to science and technology and succeed further into the future—if at all. Observed differences between small and large teams are magnified for higher-impact work, with small teams known for disruptive work and large teams for developing work. Differences in topic and research design account for a small part of the relationship between team size and disruption; most of the effect occurs at the level of the individual, as people move between smaller and larger teams. These results demonstrate that both small and large teams are essential to a flourishing ecology of science and technology, and suggest that, to achieve this, science policies should aim to support a diversity of team sizes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061804867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061804867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9

DO - 10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9

M3 - Letter

VL - 566

SP - 378

EP - 382

JO - Nature

JF - Nature

SN - 0028-0836

IS - 7744

ER -