Lattice Discrete Particle Model (LDPM) for failure behavior of concrete. II: Calibration and validation

Gianluca Cusatis; Andrea Mencarelli; Daniele Pelessone; James Baylot

doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.02.010

Lattice Discrete Particle Model (LDPM) for failure behavior of concrete. II: Calibration and validation

Gianluca Cusatis^*, Andrea Mencarelli, Daniele Pelessone, James Baylot

^*Corresponding author for this work

Civil and Environmental Engineering

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

273 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Lattice Discrete Particle Model (LDPM) formulated in the preceding Part I of this study is calibrated and validated in the present Part II. Calibration and validation is performed by comparing the results of numerical simulations with experimental data gathered from the literature. Simulated experiments include uniaxial and multiaxial compression, tensile fracture, shear strength, and cycling compression tests.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	891-905
Number of pages	15
Journal	Cement and Concrete Composites
Volume	33
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.02.010
State	Published - Oct 2011

Funding

This effort was sponsored by the US Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Permission to publish was granted by the Director, Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory. The work of first author was also supported under NSF Grant No. 0928448 and DTRA Grant No. HDTRA1-09-1-0029 to Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

Keywords

Calibration
Concrete
Discrete models
Failure
Fracture
Lattice models
Particle models
Validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Building and Construction
General Materials Science

Access to Document

10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.02.010

Cite this

@article{4c928d23647548b5b51e6c2f34f25f6f,

title = "Lattice Discrete Particle Model (LDPM) for failure behavior of concrete. II: Calibration and validation",

abstract = "The Lattice Discrete Particle Model (LDPM) formulated in the preceding Part I of this study is calibrated and validated in the present Part II. Calibration and validation is performed by comparing the results of numerical simulations with experimental data gathered from the literature. Simulated experiments include uniaxial and multiaxial compression, tensile fracture, shear strength, and cycling compression tests.",

keywords = "Calibration, Concrete, Discrete models, Failure, Fracture, Lattice models, Particle models, Validation",

author = "Gianluca Cusatis and Andrea Mencarelli and Daniele Pelessone and James Baylot",

note = "Funding Information: This effort was sponsored by the US Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Permission to publish was granted by the Director, Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory. The work of first author was also supported under NSF Grant No. 0928448 and DTRA Grant No. HDTRA1-09-1-0029 to Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.",

year = "2011",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.02.010",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "33",

pages = "891--905",

journal = "Cement and Concrete Composites",

issn = "0958-9465",

publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lattice Discrete Particle Model (LDPM) for failure behavior of concrete. II

T2 - Calibration and validation

AU - Cusatis, Gianluca

AU - Mencarelli, Andrea

AU - Pelessone, Daniele

AU - Baylot, James

N1 - Funding Information: This effort was sponsored by the US Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Permission to publish was granted by the Director, Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory. The work of first author was also supported under NSF Grant No. 0928448 and DTRA Grant No. HDTRA1-09-1-0029 to Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - The Lattice Discrete Particle Model (LDPM) formulated in the preceding Part I of this study is calibrated and validated in the present Part II. Calibration and validation is performed by comparing the results of numerical simulations with experimental data gathered from the literature. Simulated experiments include uniaxial and multiaxial compression, tensile fracture, shear strength, and cycling compression tests.

AB - The Lattice Discrete Particle Model (LDPM) formulated in the preceding Part I of this study is calibrated and validated in the present Part II. Calibration and validation is performed by comparing the results of numerical simulations with experimental data gathered from the literature. Simulated experiments include uniaxial and multiaxial compression, tensile fracture, shear strength, and cycling compression tests.

KW - Calibration

KW - Concrete

KW - Discrete models

KW - Failure

KW - Fracture

KW - Lattice models

KW - Particle models

KW - Validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052965852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052965852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.02.010

DO - 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.02.010

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80052965852

SN - 0958-9465

VL - 33

SP - 891

EP - 905

JO - Cement and Concrete Composites

JF - Cement and Concrete Composites

IS - 9

ER -

Lattice Discrete Particle Model (LDPM) for failure behavior of concrete. II: Calibration and validation

Abstract

Funding

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this