Laudan, Stein, and the Limits of Theorizing about Juridical Proof

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Two new books by Alex Stein, Foundations of Evidence Law, and Larry Laudan, Truth, Error, and Criminal Law, are compared and contrasted. Each purports to analyze and critique the conceptual foundations of the evidentiary process. Although the authors agree on some points, they disagree fundamentally. Why such disparate conceptual efforts could come about is considered and discussed, and the limits of theorizing about matters as complicated as a litigation system is addressed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)195-230
    JournalLaw and Philosophy
    Volume29
    StatePublished - 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Laudan, Stein, and the Limits of Theorizing about Juridical Proof'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this