Layaway freedom: Coercive financialization in the criminal legal system

Mary Pattillo, Gabriela Kirk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Economic sociologists have documented the rise of financialization, including credit and debt. In the case of monetary sanctions in the criminal legal system, courts frequently extend payment plans—or “layaway”—as a way for defendants to manage financial court debt and gain their freedom. Using 241 hours of courtroom ethnography and 155 interviews with court actors and people paying their court debt in Illinois, the authors offer a microsociology of financialization that shows how the creditor/debtor relationship commodifies freedom, confuses and suffuses court processes, amplifies control, and expands the financial sector into domains that obligate participation. Layaway freedomrepresents a case of coercive financialization, or the externally imposed, involuntary, or last-resort entry into financial engagements. The manipulation of money and time achieves disproportionate punishment that is multiplicative, rather than simply additive, all under the guise of routine financial responsibility. The authors discuss implications of these concepts for both economic and criminal-legal sociology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)889-930
Number of pages42
JournalAmerican Journal of Sociology
Volume126
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Layaway freedom: Coercive financialization in the criminal legal system'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this