Learning same and different relations: cross-species comparisons

Dedre Gentner, Ruxue Shao, Nina Simms, Susan Hespos

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Humans excel among species in abstract representation and reasoning. We argue that the ability to learn through analogical comparison, augmented by symbolic systems, underlies our cognitive advantage. The relations same and different are an ideal testbed for these ideas: they are fundamental, essential to abstract combinatorial thought, perceptually available, and studied extensively across species. The evidence suggests that whereas a sense of similarity is widely shared across species, abstract representations of same and different are not. We make three key claims, First, analogical comparison is critical in enabling relational learning among humans. Second, relational symbols support forming and retaining same and different relations in both humans and chimpanzees. Third, despite differences in degree of relational ability, humans and chimpanzees show significant parallels in the development of relational insight.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)84-89
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Volume37
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Learning same and different relations: cross-species comparisons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this