TY - JOUR
T1 - Leptomeningeal metastases
T2 - A RANO proposal for response criteria
AU - Chamberlain, Marc
AU - Junck, Larry
AU - Brandsma, Dieta
AU - Soffietti, Riccardo
AU - Rudà, Roberta
AU - Raizer, Jeffrey
AU - Boogerd, Willem
AU - Taillibert, Sophie
AU - Groves, Morris D.
AU - Le Rhun, Emilie
AU - Walker, Julie
AU - Van Den Bent, Martin
AU - Wen, Patrick Y.
AU - Jaeckle, Kurt A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) currently lack standardization with respect to response assessment. A Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group with expertise in LM developed a consensus proposal for evaluating patients treated for this disease. Three basic elements in assessing response in LM are proposed: a standardized neurological examination, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) cytology or flow cytometry, and radiographic evaluation. The group recommends that all patients enrolling in clinical trials undergo CSF analysis (cytology in all cancers; flow cytometry in hematologic cancers), complete contrast-enhanced neuraxis MRI, and in instances of planned intra-CSF therapy, radioisotope CSF flow studies. In conjunction with the RANO Neurological Assessment working group, a standardized instrument was created for assessing the neurological exam in patients with LM. Considering that most lesions in LM are nonmeasurable and that assessment of neuroimaging in LM is subjective, neuroimaging is graded as stable, progressive, or improved using a novel radiological LM response scorecard. Radiographic disease progression in isolation (ie, negative CSF cytology/flow cytometry and stable neurological assessment) would be defined as LM disease progression. The RANO LM working group has proposed a method of response evaluation for patients with LM that will require further testing, validation, and likely refinement with use.
AB - Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) currently lack standardization with respect to response assessment. A Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group with expertise in LM developed a consensus proposal for evaluating patients treated for this disease. Three basic elements in assessing response in LM are proposed: a standardized neurological examination, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) cytology or flow cytometry, and radiographic evaluation. The group recommends that all patients enrolling in clinical trials undergo CSF analysis (cytology in all cancers; flow cytometry in hematologic cancers), complete contrast-enhanced neuraxis MRI, and in instances of planned intra-CSF therapy, radioisotope CSF flow studies. In conjunction with the RANO Neurological Assessment working group, a standardized instrument was created for assessing the neurological exam in patients with LM. Considering that most lesions in LM are nonmeasurable and that assessment of neuroimaging in LM is subjective, neuroimaging is graded as stable, progressive, or improved using a novel radiological LM response scorecard. Radiographic disease progression in isolation (ie, negative CSF cytology/flow cytometry and stable neurological assessment) would be defined as LM disease progression. The RANO LM working group has proposed a method of response evaluation for patients with LM that will require further testing, validation, and likely refinement with use.
KW - CSF cytology/flow cytometry
KW - Leptomeningeal metastasis
KW - Neuraxis MRI
KW - Neurological examination
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019493398&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019493398&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/neuonc/now183
DO - 10.1093/neuonc/now183
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28039364
AN - SCOPUS:85019493398
SN - 1522-8517
VL - 19
SP - 484
EP - 492
JO - Neuro-oncology
JF - Neuro-oncology
IS - 4
ER -