Limitation of inverse probability-of-censoring weights in estimating survival in the presence of strong selection bias

Chanelle J. Howe, Stephen R. Cole, Joan S. Chmiel, Alvaro Muñoz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

77 Scopus citations


In time-to-event analyses, artificial censoring with correction for induced selection bias using inverse probability-of-censoring weights can be used to 1) examine the natural history of a disease after effective interventions are widely available, 2) correct bias due to noncompliance with fixed or dynamic treatment regimens, and 3) estimate survival in the presence of competing risks. Artificial censoring entails censoring participants when they meet a predefined study criterion, such as exposure to an intervention, failure to comply, or the occurrence of a competing outcome. Inverse probability-of-censoring weights use measured common predictors of the artificial censoring mechanism and the outcome of interest to determine what the survival experience of the artificially censored participants would be had they never been exposed to the intervention, complied with their treatment regimen, or not developed the competing outcome. Even if all common predictors are appropriately measured and taken into account, in the context of small sample size and strong selection bias, inverse probability-of-censoring weights could fail because of violations in assumptions necessary to correct selection bias. The authors used an example from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, 1984-2008, regarding estimation of long-term acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-free survival to demonstrate the impact of violations in necessary assumptions. Approaches to improve correction methods are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)569-577
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican journal of epidemiology
Issue number5
StatePublished - Mar 1 2011


  • epidemiologic methods
  • selection bias
  • survival analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Limitation of inverse probability-of-censoring weights in estimating survival in the presence of strong selection bias'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this