Limitations of the structural unit model

J. D. Rittner*, David N Seidman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The structural unit model (SUM) has been used to describe the structures of grain boundaries (GBs) in a range of different materials. The validity of this model for all materials has never been proven, however. The structures of Al and Ni <110> symmetric tilt grain boundaries with tilt angles between 0° and 50.5° are investigated. Computer simulations with the lattice statics technique and EAM potentials are used to find the lowest energy structures at a temperature of 0 K. The stability of the structures at elevated temperatures is tested by Monte Carlo annealing simulations. It is found that, while the SUM is applicable to the Al boundaries, it cannot be used to describe the Ni structures. The GB dislocation cores in the Al boundaries are more localized than they are in Ni. The effect of delocalized GB dislocations is discussed. The geometrical and materials dependent limitations of the SUM are summarized.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)333-336
Number of pages4
JournalMaterials Science Forum
Volume207-209
Issue numberPART 1
StatePublished - Dec 1 1996

Fingerprint

Grain boundaries
grain boundaries
Dislocations (crystals)
embedded atom method
computerized simulation
Annealing
Temperature
annealing
temperature
Computer simulation
simulation
energy

Keywords

  • Grain Boundary Dislocation Cores
  • Grain Boundary Structure
  • Simulation
  • Structural Unit Model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Materials Science(all)

Cite this

Rittner, J. D. ; Seidman, David N. / Limitations of the structural unit model. In: Materials Science Forum. 1996 ; Vol. 207-209, No. PART 1. pp. 333-336.
@article{a1da4429b3d84da891c94fd8564bf0ce,
title = "Limitations of the structural unit model",
abstract = "The structural unit model (SUM) has been used to describe the structures of grain boundaries (GBs) in a range of different materials. The validity of this model for all materials has never been proven, however. The structures of Al and Ni <110> symmetric tilt grain boundaries with tilt angles between 0° and 50.5° are investigated. Computer simulations with the lattice statics technique and EAM potentials are used to find the lowest energy structures at a temperature of 0 K. The stability of the structures at elevated temperatures is tested by Monte Carlo annealing simulations. It is found that, while the SUM is applicable to the Al boundaries, it cannot be used to describe the Ni structures. The GB dislocation cores in the Al boundaries are more localized than they are in Ni. The effect of delocalized GB dislocations is discussed. The geometrical and materials dependent limitations of the SUM are summarized.",
keywords = "Grain Boundary Dislocation Cores, Grain Boundary Structure, Simulation, Structural Unit Model",
author = "Rittner, {J. D.} and Seidman, {David N}",
year = "1996",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "207-209",
pages = "333--336",
journal = "Materials Science Forum",
issn = "0255-5476",
publisher = "Trans Tech Publications",
number = "PART 1",

}

Rittner, JD & Seidman, DN 1996, 'Limitations of the structural unit model', Materials Science Forum, vol. 207-209, no. PART 1, pp. 333-336.

Limitations of the structural unit model. / Rittner, J. D.; Seidman, David N.

In: Materials Science Forum, Vol. 207-209, No. PART 1, 01.12.1996, p. 333-336.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Limitations of the structural unit model

AU - Rittner, J. D.

AU - Seidman, David N

PY - 1996/12/1

Y1 - 1996/12/1

N2 - The structural unit model (SUM) has been used to describe the structures of grain boundaries (GBs) in a range of different materials. The validity of this model for all materials has never been proven, however. The structures of Al and Ni <110> symmetric tilt grain boundaries with tilt angles between 0° and 50.5° are investigated. Computer simulations with the lattice statics technique and EAM potentials are used to find the lowest energy structures at a temperature of 0 K. The stability of the structures at elevated temperatures is tested by Monte Carlo annealing simulations. It is found that, while the SUM is applicable to the Al boundaries, it cannot be used to describe the Ni structures. The GB dislocation cores in the Al boundaries are more localized than they are in Ni. The effect of delocalized GB dislocations is discussed. The geometrical and materials dependent limitations of the SUM are summarized.

AB - The structural unit model (SUM) has been used to describe the structures of grain boundaries (GBs) in a range of different materials. The validity of this model for all materials has never been proven, however. The structures of Al and Ni <110> symmetric tilt grain boundaries with tilt angles between 0° and 50.5° are investigated. Computer simulations with the lattice statics technique and EAM potentials are used to find the lowest energy structures at a temperature of 0 K. The stability of the structures at elevated temperatures is tested by Monte Carlo annealing simulations. It is found that, while the SUM is applicable to the Al boundaries, it cannot be used to describe the Ni structures. The GB dislocation cores in the Al boundaries are more localized than they are in Ni. The effect of delocalized GB dislocations is discussed. The geometrical and materials dependent limitations of the SUM are summarized.

KW - Grain Boundary Dislocation Cores

KW - Grain Boundary Structure

KW - Simulation

KW - Structural Unit Model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029756468&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029756468&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 207-209

SP - 333

EP - 336

JO - Materials Science Forum

JF - Materials Science Forum

SN - 0255-5476

IS - PART 1

ER -

Rittner JD, Seidman DN. Limitations of the structural unit model. Materials Science Forum. 1996 Dec 1;207-209(PART 1):333-336.