TY - JOUR
T1 - Limited interaction in speech production
T2 - Chronometric, speech error, and neuropsychological evidence
AU - Goldrick, Matthew
N1 - Funding Information:
Correspondence should be addressed to Matthew Goldrick, Department of Linguistics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA. E-mail: goldrick@ling.northwestern.edu Preparation of this paper was supported in part by National Institute of Health grants R01 MH-64733, R01 HD21011, and R01 MH66089, and National Science Foundation grant BCS 0213270.
Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2006/10
Y1 - 2006/10
N2 - Results from chronometric and speech errors studies provide convergent evidence for both lower and upper bounds on interaction within the speech production system. Some degree of cascading activation is required to account for patterns of speech errors in neurologically intact and impaired speakers as well as the results of recent chronometric studies. However, the strength of this form of interaction must be limited to account for the occurrence of selective deficits in the production system and restrictions on the conditions under which interactive effects influence reaction times. Similarly, some amount of feedback from phonological to word-level representations is necessary to account for patterns of speech errors in neurologically intact and impaired individuals as well as the influence of phonological neighbours on response latency. This interactive mechanism must also be limited to account for restrictions on the types of speech errors produced following selective deficits within the production system. Results from a variety of empirical traditions therefore converge on the same conclusion: interaction is present, but it must be crucially limited.
AB - Results from chronometric and speech errors studies provide convergent evidence for both lower and upper bounds on interaction within the speech production system. Some degree of cascading activation is required to account for patterns of speech errors in neurologically intact and impaired speakers as well as the results of recent chronometric studies. However, the strength of this form of interaction must be limited to account for the occurrence of selective deficits in the production system and restrictions on the conditions under which interactive effects influence reaction times. Similarly, some amount of feedback from phonological to word-level representations is necessary to account for patterns of speech errors in neurologically intact and impaired individuals as well as the influence of phonological neighbours on response latency. This interactive mechanism must also be limited to account for restrictions on the types of speech errors produced following selective deficits within the production system. Results from a variety of empirical traditions therefore converge on the same conclusion: interaction is present, but it must be crucially limited.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750447043&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750447043&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/01690960600824112
DO - 10.1080/01690960600824112
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33750447043
SN - 2327-3798
VL - 21
SP - 817
EP - 855
JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
IS - 7-8
ER -