Living arrangements and quality of life among older adults in China: does social cohesion matter?

Xiaoning Huang*, Jinyu Liu, Ai Bo

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated how living arrangements are related to the well-being of Chinese older adults and the role of social cohesion in this relationship. Methods: This study used the China data from the WHO’s Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health. The analytic sample featured 5,600 Chinese adults aged 60 or older. The study conceptualized two sets of models: social cohesion as mediators and as moderators in the relationship of living arrangements and quality of life. Results: Results from structural equation modelling analyses show that Chinese older adults who lived with adult children had lower quality of life scores compared with those who did not live with adult children; the negative relationship was partially mediated through decreased social cohesion. The study also found social cohesion may buffer the negative influence of not living with a spouse compared with those who did. Conclusion: This study sheds light on the mediating and moderating effects of social cohesion on the relationship between living arrangement and quality of life among older adults in China. The findings indicate the necessity of promoting social connectedness and neighborhood cohesion for older Chinese, especially those who live with their adult children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2053-2062
Number of pages10
JournalAging and Mental Health
Volume24
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2020

Keywords

  • aging
  • social network
  • Structural equation modelling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Phychiatric Mental Health
  • Gerontology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Living arrangements and quality of life among older adults in China: does social cohesion matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this