Load-release points of two novel ureteral stone-trapping devices

Michael K. Ouwenga, Sameer K. Sharma, Paulette Holley, Thomas M T Turk, Kent T. Perry*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations


Purpose: We compared the load-release points of the Stone Cone™ and the new Cook Urological NTrap™ devices using an in vitro model of the ureter. Materials and Methods: A strictured-ureter model was created using urethane tubing with a wire tie around it. A plastic bead was lodged above this narrowing. The Stone Cone, then the NTrap, was deployed in turn above this bead. The force required for each device to undeploy was measured over five trials. Results: Each device released the bead in every trial. The Stone Cone released at a mean of 0.190 lb, while the NTrap yielded at 0.861 lb. Conclusions: Both of the devices released the plastic bead reliably and at low loads, although the NTrap did require statistically significantly more force than the Stone Cone. However, the loads for both devices were <1 lb, so the devices are unlikely to result in ureteral trauma. Whether a slight increase in load-release force or differences in design result in better stone-clearing ability of one device should be assessed in clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)894-897
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Endourology
Issue number7
StatePublished - Sep 1 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Load-release points of two novel ureteral stone-trapping devices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this