Load-release points of two novel ureteral stone-trapping devices

Michael K. Ouwenga, Sameer K. Sharma, Paulette Holley, Thomas M T Turk, Kent T. Perry*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We compared the load-release points of the Stone Cone™ and the new Cook Urological NTrap™ devices using an in vitro model of the ureter. Materials and Methods: A strictured-ureter model was created using urethane tubing with a wire tie around it. A plastic bead was lodged above this narrowing. The Stone Cone, then the NTrap, was deployed in turn above this bead. The force required for each device to undeploy was measured over five trials. Results: Each device released the bead in every trial. The Stone Cone released at a mean of 0.190 lb, while the NTrap yielded at 0.861 lb. Conclusions: Both of the devices released the plastic bead reliably and at low loads, although the NTrap did require statistically significantly more force than the Stone Cone. However, the loads for both devices were <1 lb, so the devices are unlikely to result in ureteral trauma. Whether a slight increase in load-release force or differences in design result in better stone-clearing ability of one device should be assessed in clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)894-897
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume19
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2005

Fingerprint

Equipment and Supplies
Ureter
Plastics
Urethane
Clinical Trials
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Ouwenga, Michael K. ; Sharma, Sameer K. ; Holley, Paulette ; Turk, Thomas M T ; Perry, Kent T. / Load-release points of two novel ureteral stone-trapping devices. In: Journal of Endourology. 2005 ; Vol. 19, No. 7. pp. 894-897.
@article{4fdba56ab6124f1ba2a564b73bf35fa1,
title = "Load-release points of two novel ureteral stone-trapping devices",
abstract = "Purpose: We compared the load-release points of the Stone Cone™ and the new Cook Urological NTrap™ devices using an in vitro model of the ureter. Materials and Methods: A strictured-ureter model was created using urethane tubing with a wire tie around it. A plastic bead was lodged above this narrowing. The Stone Cone, then the NTrap, was deployed in turn above this bead. The force required for each device to undeploy was measured over five trials. Results: Each device released the bead in every trial. The Stone Cone released at a mean of 0.190 lb, while the NTrap yielded at 0.861 lb. Conclusions: Both of the devices released the plastic bead reliably and at low loads, although the NTrap did require statistically significantly more force than the Stone Cone. However, the loads for both devices were <1 lb, so the devices are unlikely to result in ureteral trauma. Whether a slight increase in load-release force or differences in design result in better stone-clearing ability of one device should be assessed in clinical trials.",
author = "Ouwenga, {Michael K.} and Sharma, {Sameer K.} and Paulette Holley and Turk, {Thomas M T} and Perry, {Kent T.}",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/end.2005.19.894",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "894--897",
journal = "Journal of Endourology",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "7",

}

Load-release points of two novel ureteral stone-trapping devices. / Ouwenga, Michael K.; Sharma, Sameer K.; Holley, Paulette; Turk, Thomas M T; Perry, Kent T.

In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 19, No. 7, 01.09.2005, p. 894-897.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Load-release points of two novel ureteral stone-trapping devices

AU - Ouwenga, Michael K.

AU - Sharma, Sameer K.

AU - Holley, Paulette

AU - Turk, Thomas M T

AU - Perry, Kent T.

PY - 2005/9/1

Y1 - 2005/9/1

N2 - Purpose: We compared the load-release points of the Stone Cone™ and the new Cook Urological NTrap™ devices using an in vitro model of the ureter. Materials and Methods: A strictured-ureter model was created using urethane tubing with a wire tie around it. A plastic bead was lodged above this narrowing. The Stone Cone, then the NTrap, was deployed in turn above this bead. The force required for each device to undeploy was measured over five trials. Results: Each device released the bead in every trial. The Stone Cone released at a mean of 0.190 lb, while the NTrap yielded at 0.861 lb. Conclusions: Both of the devices released the plastic bead reliably and at low loads, although the NTrap did require statistically significantly more force than the Stone Cone. However, the loads for both devices were <1 lb, so the devices are unlikely to result in ureteral trauma. Whether a slight increase in load-release force or differences in design result in better stone-clearing ability of one device should be assessed in clinical trials.

AB - Purpose: We compared the load-release points of the Stone Cone™ and the new Cook Urological NTrap™ devices using an in vitro model of the ureter. Materials and Methods: A strictured-ureter model was created using urethane tubing with a wire tie around it. A plastic bead was lodged above this narrowing. The Stone Cone, then the NTrap, was deployed in turn above this bead. The force required for each device to undeploy was measured over five trials. Results: Each device released the bead in every trial. The Stone Cone released at a mean of 0.190 lb, while the NTrap yielded at 0.861 lb. Conclusions: Both of the devices released the plastic bead reliably and at low loads, although the NTrap did require statistically significantly more force than the Stone Cone. However, the loads for both devices were <1 lb, so the devices are unlikely to result in ureteral trauma. Whether a slight increase in load-release force or differences in design result in better stone-clearing ability of one device should be assessed in clinical trials.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=26444589168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=26444589168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/end.2005.19.894

DO - 10.1089/end.2005.19.894

M3 - Article

C2 - 16190853

AN - SCOPUS:26444589168

VL - 19

SP - 894

EP - 897

JO - Journal of Endourology

JF - Journal of Endourology

SN - 0892-7790

IS - 7

ER -