TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term cryopreservation of human oocytes does not increase embryonic aneuploidy
AU - Goldman, Kara Nicole
AU - Kramer, Yael
AU - Hodes-Wertz, Brooke
AU - Noyes, Nicole
AU - McCaffrey, Caroline
AU - Grifo, Jamie A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
PY - 2015/3/1
Y1 - 2015/3/1
N2 - Objective To determine if long-term cryopreservation of human oocytes affects oocyte developmental competence, blastocyst euploidy, or live-birth rates. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting University-based fertility center. Patient(s) A total of 33 patients with cryopreserved oocytes underwent oocyte thaw, blastocyst culture, trophectoderm biopsy, and 24-chromosome preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) with array comparative genomic hybridization between December 2011 and July 2014; subjects were compared with 2:1 age-matched controls with fresh oocytes whose embryos underwent trophectoderm biopsy and PGS during the same period. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) Rates of fertilization, blastulation, euploidy, implantation, and live birth. Result(s) Thirty-three patients (mean age 36.2 ± 3.8 y) thawed 475 oocytes that had been cryopreserved for a median of 3.5 years. Compared with 66 age-matched controls who underwent in vitro fertilization and PGS with fresh oocytes, embryos derived from cryopreserved oocytes demonstrated compromised blastocyst formation (54.5% vs. 66.2%) despite no impairment in fertilization (72.8% vs. 73.2%). Results showed no difference in the number of euploid blastocysts (1.7 ± 1.9 vs. 2 ± 2.5), percentage of euploid blastocysts (44.5% vs. 47.6%), rate of implantation (65% vs. 65%), or rate of live birth and ongoing pregnancy (62.5% vs. 55%) after 24-chromosome PGS with cryopreserved or fresh oocytes. Conclusion(s) Embryos derived from cryopreserved oocytes demonstrate impaired blastulation but equivalent rates of euploidy, implantation, and live birth compared with blastocysts derived from fresh oocytes, supporting the safety and efficacy of oocyte cryopreservation.
AB - Objective To determine if long-term cryopreservation of human oocytes affects oocyte developmental competence, blastocyst euploidy, or live-birth rates. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting University-based fertility center. Patient(s) A total of 33 patients with cryopreserved oocytes underwent oocyte thaw, blastocyst culture, trophectoderm biopsy, and 24-chromosome preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) with array comparative genomic hybridization between December 2011 and July 2014; subjects were compared with 2:1 age-matched controls with fresh oocytes whose embryos underwent trophectoderm biopsy and PGS during the same period. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) Rates of fertilization, blastulation, euploidy, implantation, and live birth. Result(s) Thirty-three patients (mean age 36.2 ± 3.8 y) thawed 475 oocytes that had been cryopreserved for a median of 3.5 years. Compared with 66 age-matched controls who underwent in vitro fertilization and PGS with fresh oocytes, embryos derived from cryopreserved oocytes demonstrated compromised blastocyst formation (54.5% vs. 66.2%) despite no impairment in fertilization (72.8% vs. 73.2%). Results showed no difference in the number of euploid blastocysts (1.7 ± 1.9 vs. 2 ± 2.5), percentage of euploid blastocysts (44.5% vs. 47.6%), rate of implantation (65% vs. 65%), or rate of live birth and ongoing pregnancy (62.5% vs. 55%) after 24-chromosome PGS with cryopreserved or fresh oocytes. Conclusion(s) Embryos derived from cryopreserved oocytes demonstrate impaired blastulation but equivalent rates of euploidy, implantation, and live birth compared with blastocysts derived from fresh oocytes, supporting the safety and efficacy of oocyte cryopreservation.
KW - 24-chromosome preimplantation genetic screening
KW - Oocyte cryopreservation
KW - aneuploidy
KW - blastocyst formation
KW - fertility preservation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84926216787
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926216787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.11.025
DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.11.025
M3 - Article
C2 - 25542819
AN - SCOPUS:84926216787
SN - 0015-0282
VL - 103
SP - 662
EP - 668
JO - Fertility and Sterility
JF - Fertility and Sterility
IS - 3
ER -