Low prevalence of clinical decision support to calculate caloric and fluid intake for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit

Gustave H. Falciglia*, Karna Murthy, Jane L. Holl, Hannah L. Palac, Donna M. Woods, Daniel T. Robinson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Clinical decision support (CDS) improves nutrition delivery for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), however, the prevalence of CDS to support nutrition is unknown. Methods: Online surveys, with telephone and email validation of responses, were administered to NICU clinicians in the Children’s Hospital Neonatal Consortium (CHNC). We determined and compared the availability of CDS to calculate calories and fluid received in the prior 24 h, stratified by enteral and parenteral intake, using McNemar’s test. Results: Clinicians at all 34 CHNC hospitals responded with 98 of 108 (91%) surveys completed. NICUs have considerably less CDS to calculate enteral calories received than enteral fluid received (32% vs. 82%, p < 0.001) and less CDS to calculate parenteral calories received than parenteral fluid received (29% vs. 82%, p < 0.001). Discussion: Most CHNC NICUs are unable to reliably and consistently monitor caloric intake delivered to critically ill infants at risk for growth failure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)497-503
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Perinatology
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Low prevalence of clinical decision support to calculate caloric and fluid intake for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this