Lung volume reduction surgery

Technique, operative mortality, and morbidity

Malcolm M. DeCamp, Robert J. McKenna, Claude C. Deschamps, Mark J. Krasna

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is the safe, effective, and durable palliation of dyspnea in appropriately selected patients with moderate to severe emphysema. Appropriate patient selection and preoperative preparation are prerequisites for successful LVRS. An effective LVRS program requires participation by and communication between experts from pulmonary medicine, thoracic surgery, thoracic anesthesiology, critical care medicine, rehabilitation medicine, respiratory therapy, chest radiology, and nursing. The critical analysis of perioperative outcomes has influenced details of the conduct of the procedure and has established a bilateral, stapled approach as the standard of care for LVRS. The National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) remains the world's largest multi-center, randomized trial comparing LVRS to maximal medical therapy. NETT purposely enrolled a broad spectrum of anatomic patterns of emphysema. This, along with the prospective, audited collection of extensive demographic, physiologic, radiographic, surgical and quality-of-life data, has positioned NETT as the most robust repository of evidence to guide the refinement of patient selection criteria for LVRS, to assist surgeons in providing optimal intraoperative and postoperative care, and to establish benchmarks for survival, complication rates, return to independent living, and durability of response. This article reviews the evolution of current LVRS practice with a particular emphasis on technical aspects of the operation, including the predictors and consequences of its most common complications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)442-446
Number of pages5
JournalProceedings of the American Thoracic Society
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2008

Fingerprint

Pneumonectomy
Emphysema
Morbidity
Mortality
Patient Selection
Medicine Chests
Intraoperative Care
Thorax
Medicine
Independent Living
Respiratory Therapy
Benchmarking
Pulmonary Medicine
Anesthesiology
Postoperative Care
Therapeutics
Critical Care
Standard of Care
Radiology
Dyspnea

Keywords

  • Complications
  • Emphysema
  • Outcomes
  • Surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

DeCamp, Malcolm M. ; McKenna, Robert J. ; Deschamps, Claude C. ; Krasna, Mark J. / Lung volume reduction surgery : Technique, operative mortality, and morbidity. In: Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society. 2008 ; Vol. 5, No. 4. pp. 442-446.
@article{c919028a5cc54032962523cfaa8c724f,
title = "Lung volume reduction surgery: Technique, operative mortality, and morbidity",
abstract = "The objective of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is the safe, effective, and durable palliation of dyspnea in appropriately selected patients with moderate to severe emphysema. Appropriate patient selection and preoperative preparation are prerequisites for successful LVRS. An effective LVRS program requires participation by and communication between experts from pulmonary medicine, thoracic surgery, thoracic anesthesiology, critical care medicine, rehabilitation medicine, respiratory therapy, chest radiology, and nursing. The critical analysis of perioperative outcomes has influenced details of the conduct of the procedure and has established a bilateral, stapled approach as the standard of care for LVRS. The National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) remains the world's largest multi-center, randomized trial comparing LVRS to maximal medical therapy. NETT purposely enrolled a broad spectrum of anatomic patterns of emphysema. This, along with the prospective, audited collection of extensive demographic, physiologic, radiographic, surgical and quality-of-life data, has positioned NETT as the most robust repository of evidence to guide the refinement of patient selection criteria for LVRS, to assist surgeons in providing optimal intraoperative and postoperative care, and to establish benchmarks for survival, complication rates, return to independent living, and durability of response. This article reviews the evolution of current LVRS practice with a particular emphasis on technical aspects of the operation, including the predictors and consequences of its most common complications.",
keywords = "Complications, Emphysema, Outcomes, Surgery",
author = "DeCamp, {Malcolm M.} and McKenna, {Robert J.} and Deschamps, {Claude C.} and Krasna, {Mark J.}",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1513/pats.200803-023ET",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "442--446",
journal = "Annals of the American Thoracic Society",
issn = "2325-6621",
publisher = "American Thoracic Society",
number = "4",

}

Lung volume reduction surgery : Technique, operative mortality, and morbidity. / DeCamp, Malcolm M.; McKenna, Robert J.; Deschamps, Claude C.; Krasna, Mark J.

In: Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, Vol. 5, No. 4, 01.05.2008, p. 442-446.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lung volume reduction surgery

T2 - Technique, operative mortality, and morbidity

AU - DeCamp, Malcolm M.

AU - McKenna, Robert J.

AU - Deschamps, Claude C.

AU - Krasna, Mark J.

PY - 2008/5/1

Y1 - 2008/5/1

N2 - The objective of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is the safe, effective, and durable palliation of dyspnea in appropriately selected patients with moderate to severe emphysema. Appropriate patient selection and preoperative preparation are prerequisites for successful LVRS. An effective LVRS program requires participation by and communication between experts from pulmonary medicine, thoracic surgery, thoracic anesthesiology, critical care medicine, rehabilitation medicine, respiratory therapy, chest radiology, and nursing. The critical analysis of perioperative outcomes has influenced details of the conduct of the procedure and has established a bilateral, stapled approach as the standard of care for LVRS. The National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) remains the world's largest multi-center, randomized trial comparing LVRS to maximal medical therapy. NETT purposely enrolled a broad spectrum of anatomic patterns of emphysema. This, along with the prospective, audited collection of extensive demographic, physiologic, radiographic, surgical and quality-of-life data, has positioned NETT as the most robust repository of evidence to guide the refinement of patient selection criteria for LVRS, to assist surgeons in providing optimal intraoperative and postoperative care, and to establish benchmarks for survival, complication rates, return to independent living, and durability of response. This article reviews the evolution of current LVRS practice with a particular emphasis on technical aspects of the operation, including the predictors and consequences of its most common complications.

AB - The objective of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is the safe, effective, and durable palliation of dyspnea in appropriately selected patients with moderate to severe emphysema. Appropriate patient selection and preoperative preparation are prerequisites for successful LVRS. An effective LVRS program requires participation by and communication between experts from pulmonary medicine, thoracic surgery, thoracic anesthesiology, critical care medicine, rehabilitation medicine, respiratory therapy, chest radiology, and nursing. The critical analysis of perioperative outcomes has influenced details of the conduct of the procedure and has established a bilateral, stapled approach as the standard of care for LVRS. The National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) remains the world's largest multi-center, randomized trial comparing LVRS to maximal medical therapy. NETT purposely enrolled a broad spectrum of anatomic patterns of emphysema. This, along with the prospective, audited collection of extensive demographic, physiologic, radiographic, surgical and quality-of-life data, has positioned NETT as the most robust repository of evidence to guide the refinement of patient selection criteria for LVRS, to assist surgeons in providing optimal intraoperative and postoperative care, and to establish benchmarks for survival, complication rates, return to independent living, and durability of response. This article reviews the evolution of current LVRS practice with a particular emphasis on technical aspects of the operation, including the predictors and consequences of its most common complications.

KW - Complications

KW - Emphysema

KW - Outcomes

KW - Surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43449121577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43449121577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1513/pats.200803-023ET

DO - 10.1513/pats.200803-023ET

M3 - Review article

VL - 5

SP - 442

EP - 446

JO - Annals of the American Thoracic Society

JF - Annals of the American Thoracic Society

SN - 2325-6621

IS - 4

ER -