TY - JOUR
T1 - Machine Learning for the Prediction of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
T2 - A Post Hoc Pilot Study of 28 Participants
AU - Hopkins, Benjamin S.
AU - Weber, Kenneth A.
AU - Kesavabhotla, Kartik
AU - Paliwal, Monica
AU - Cantrell, Donald R.
AU - Smith, Zachary A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflict of interest statement: Funding contributing to this manuscript has been received by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (grant number T32DA035165), the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (grant number K23NS104211), and the Neurosurgical Research Education Fund Summer Student Research Fellowship. The authors otherwise have nothing to disclose and no further conflicts of interest. Conflict of interest statement: Funding contributing to this manuscript has been received by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (grant number T32DA035165), the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (grant number K23NS104211), and the Neurosurgical Research Education Fund Summer Student Research Fellowship. The authors otherwise have nothing to disclose and no further conflicts of interest.
PY - 2019/7
Y1 - 2019/7
N2 - Background: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) severity and presence of symptoms are often difficult to predict based simply on clinical imaging alone. Similarly, improved machine learning techniques provide new tools with immense clinical potential. Methods: A total of 14 patients with CSM and 14 controls underwent imaging of the cervical spine. Two different artificial neural network models were trained; 1) to predict CSM diagnosis; and 2) to predict CSM severity. Model 1 consisted of 6 inputs including 3 common imaging scales for the evaluation of cord compression, alongside 3 objective magnetic resonance imaging measurements. The outcome for model 1 was binary to predict CSM diagnosis. Model 2 consisted of 23 input variables derived from probabilistic volume mapping measurements of white matter tracts in the region of compression. The outcome of model 2 was linear, to predict the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score. Results: Model 1 was used in predicting CSM. The mean cross-validated accuracy of the trained model was 86.50% (95% confidence interval, 85.16%–87.83%) with a median accuracy of 90.00%. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for each repetition. Average AUC for each repetition was 0.947 with a median AUC of 1.0. Average sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 90.25%, 85.05%, 81.58%, and 91.94%, respectively. Model 2 was used in modeling mJOA. The mJOA model predicted scores, with a mean and median error of –0.29 mJOA points and –0.08 mJOA points, respectively, mean error per batch was 0.714 mJOA points. Conclusions: Machine learning provides a promising method for prediction, diagnosis, and even prognosis in patients with CSM.
AB - Background: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) severity and presence of symptoms are often difficult to predict based simply on clinical imaging alone. Similarly, improved machine learning techniques provide new tools with immense clinical potential. Methods: A total of 14 patients with CSM and 14 controls underwent imaging of the cervical spine. Two different artificial neural network models were trained; 1) to predict CSM diagnosis; and 2) to predict CSM severity. Model 1 consisted of 6 inputs including 3 common imaging scales for the evaluation of cord compression, alongside 3 objective magnetic resonance imaging measurements. The outcome for model 1 was binary to predict CSM diagnosis. Model 2 consisted of 23 input variables derived from probabilistic volume mapping measurements of white matter tracts in the region of compression. The outcome of model 2 was linear, to predict the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score. Results: Model 1 was used in predicting CSM. The mean cross-validated accuracy of the trained model was 86.50% (95% confidence interval, 85.16%–87.83%) with a median accuracy of 90.00%. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for each repetition. Average AUC for each repetition was 0.947 with a median AUC of 1.0. Average sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 90.25%, 85.05%, 81.58%, and 91.94%, respectively. Model 2 was used in modeling mJOA. The mJOA model predicted scores, with a mean and median error of –0.29 mJOA points and –0.08 mJOA points, respectively, mean error per batch was 0.714 mJOA points. Conclusions: Machine learning provides a promising method for prediction, diagnosis, and even prognosis in patients with CSM.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - CSM
KW - Cervical myelopathy
KW - Cervical spondylotic myelopathy
KW - Machine learning
KW - Spine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064955272&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064955272&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.165
DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.165
M3 - Article
C2 - 30922901
AN - SCOPUS:85064955272
VL - 127
SP - e436-e442
JO - World Neurosurgery
JF - World Neurosurgery
SN - 1878-8750
ER -