Magnetic Resonance Arteriography/Venography is Not Accurate to Structure Management of the Impalpable Testis

Naresh V. Desireddi, Dennis B. Liu, Max Maizels*, Cynthia Rigsby, Jessica T. Casey, Earl Y. Cheng

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Recent studies have shown that magnetic resonance arteriography/venography is a highly sensitive tool to identify impalpable testes in young boys. Due to this and the low risk of cancer in testicular nubbins observation has been proposed after the identification of nubbins by magnetic resonance arteriography/venography. We prospectively examined the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic resonance arteriography/venography for identifying impalpable testes in a younger cohort of patients typically seen at a pediatric institution in the United States. Materials and Methods: We prospectively studied 26 infants and boys with impalpable testes. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic resonance arteriography/venography was performed in all patients. All patients subsequently underwent surgical exploration. Surgical and radiological findings were then evaluated for concordance. Results: A total of 26 boys (29 impalpable testes) with a median age of 13 months were evaluated. A subset of 14 boys (14 impalpable testes) also underwent magnetic resonance arteriography/venography. Standard magnetic resonance imaging correctly identified 10 of 12 intra-abdominal testes, 4 of 6 intracanalicular testes, 4 of 10 testicular nubbins and 0 of 1 scrotal testis. Magnetic resonance arteriography/venography correctly identified 4 of 5 intra-abdominal testes, 2 of 3 intracanalicular testes, 2 of 5 testicular nubbins and 0 of 1 scrotal testis. The overall accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging alone and magnetic resonance arteriography/venography for identifying a viable testis or testicular nubbin was 62% and 57%, respectively. The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arteriography/venography for identifying a viable testis was 74% and 67%, respectively. Conclusions: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance arteriography/venography does not accurately identify or localize impalpable testes in the age group typically presenting to pediatric urologists. Accuracy at our institution is discrepant with that in previous studies. We do not recommend using magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance arteriography/venography for the possible observation of vanishing testes or nubbins and we recommend surgical exploration in all individuals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1805-1809
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume180
Issue number4 SUPPL.
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2008

Fingerprint

Phlebography
Testis
Angiography
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Observation
Pediatrics
Testicular Neoplasms

Keywords

  • cryptorchidism
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • phlebography
  • testis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

@article{a13ba8e0c1a24da686d52779c861a30f,
title = "Magnetic Resonance Arteriography/Venography is Not Accurate to Structure Management of the Impalpable Testis",
abstract = "Purpose: Recent studies have shown that magnetic resonance arteriography/venography is a highly sensitive tool to identify impalpable testes in young boys. Due to this and the low risk of cancer in testicular nubbins observation has been proposed after the identification of nubbins by magnetic resonance arteriography/venography. We prospectively examined the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic resonance arteriography/venography for identifying impalpable testes in a younger cohort of patients typically seen at a pediatric institution in the United States. Materials and Methods: We prospectively studied 26 infants and boys with impalpable testes. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic resonance arteriography/venography was performed in all patients. All patients subsequently underwent surgical exploration. Surgical and radiological findings were then evaluated for concordance. Results: A total of 26 boys (29 impalpable testes) with a median age of 13 months were evaluated. A subset of 14 boys (14 impalpable testes) also underwent magnetic resonance arteriography/venography. Standard magnetic resonance imaging correctly identified 10 of 12 intra-abdominal testes, 4 of 6 intracanalicular testes, 4 of 10 testicular nubbins and 0 of 1 scrotal testis. Magnetic resonance arteriography/venography correctly identified 4 of 5 intra-abdominal testes, 2 of 3 intracanalicular testes, 2 of 5 testicular nubbins and 0 of 1 scrotal testis. The overall accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging alone and magnetic resonance arteriography/venography for identifying a viable testis or testicular nubbin was 62{\%} and 57{\%}, respectively. The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arteriography/venography for identifying a viable testis was 74{\%} and 67{\%}, respectively. Conclusions: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance arteriography/venography does not accurately identify or localize impalpable testes in the age group typically presenting to pediatric urologists. Accuracy at our institution is discrepant with that in previous studies. We do not recommend using magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance arteriography/venography for the possible observation of vanishing testes or nubbins and we recommend surgical exploration in all individuals.",
keywords = "cryptorchidism, magnetic resonance imaging, phlebography, testis",
author = "Desireddi, {Naresh V.} and Liu, {Dennis B.} and Max Maizels and Cynthia Rigsby and Casey, {Jessica T.} and Cheng, {Earl Y.}",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.075",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "180",
pages = "1805--1809",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4 SUPPL.",

}

Magnetic Resonance Arteriography/Venography is Not Accurate to Structure Management of the Impalpable Testis. / Desireddi, Naresh V.; Liu, Dennis B.; Maizels, Max; Rigsby, Cynthia; Casey, Jessica T.; Cheng, Earl Y.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 180, No. 4 SUPPL., 01.10.2008, p. 1805-1809.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Magnetic Resonance Arteriography/Venography is Not Accurate to Structure Management of the Impalpable Testis

AU - Desireddi, Naresh V.

AU - Liu, Dennis B.

AU - Maizels, Max

AU - Rigsby, Cynthia

AU - Casey, Jessica T.

AU - Cheng, Earl Y.

PY - 2008/10/1

Y1 - 2008/10/1

N2 - Purpose: Recent studies have shown that magnetic resonance arteriography/venography is a highly sensitive tool to identify impalpable testes in young boys. Due to this and the low risk of cancer in testicular nubbins observation has been proposed after the identification of nubbins by magnetic resonance arteriography/venography. We prospectively examined the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic resonance arteriography/venography for identifying impalpable testes in a younger cohort of patients typically seen at a pediatric institution in the United States. Materials and Methods: We prospectively studied 26 infants and boys with impalpable testes. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic resonance arteriography/venography was performed in all patients. All patients subsequently underwent surgical exploration. Surgical and radiological findings were then evaluated for concordance. Results: A total of 26 boys (29 impalpable testes) with a median age of 13 months were evaluated. A subset of 14 boys (14 impalpable testes) also underwent magnetic resonance arteriography/venography. Standard magnetic resonance imaging correctly identified 10 of 12 intra-abdominal testes, 4 of 6 intracanalicular testes, 4 of 10 testicular nubbins and 0 of 1 scrotal testis. Magnetic resonance arteriography/venography correctly identified 4 of 5 intra-abdominal testes, 2 of 3 intracanalicular testes, 2 of 5 testicular nubbins and 0 of 1 scrotal testis. The overall accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging alone and magnetic resonance arteriography/venography for identifying a viable testis or testicular nubbin was 62% and 57%, respectively. The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arteriography/venography for identifying a viable testis was 74% and 67%, respectively. Conclusions: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance arteriography/venography does not accurately identify or localize impalpable testes in the age group typically presenting to pediatric urologists. Accuracy at our institution is discrepant with that in previous studies. We do not recommend using magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance arteriography/venography for the possible observation of vanishing testes or nubbins and we recommend surgical exploration in all individuals.

AB - Purpose: Recent studies have shown that magnetic resonance arteriography/venography is a highly sensitive tool to identify impalpable testes in young boys. Due to this and the low risk of cancer in testicular nubbins observation has been proposed after the identification of nubbins by magnetic resonance arteriography/venography. We prospectively examined the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic resonance arteriography/venography for identifying impalpable testes in a younger cohort of patients typically seen at a pediatric institution in the United States. Materials and Methods: We prospectively studied 26 infants and boys with impalpable testes. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic resonance arteriography/venography was performed in all patients. All patients subsequently underwent surgical exploration. Surgical and radiological findings were then evaluated for concordance. Results: A total of 26 boys (29 impalpable testes) with a median age of 13 months were evaluated. A subset of 14 boys (14 impalpable testes) also underwent magnetic resonance arteriography/venography. Standard magnetic resonance imaging correctly identified 10 of 12 intra-abdominal testes, 4 of 6 intracanalicular testes, 4 of 10 testicular nubbins and 0 of 1 scrotal testis. Magnetic resonance arteriography/venography correctly identified 4 of 5 intra-abdominal testes, 2 of 3 intracanalicular testes, 2 of 5 testicular nubbins and 0 of 1 scrotal testis. The overall accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging alone and magnetic resonance arteriography/venography for identifying a viable testis or testicular nubbin was 62% and 57%, respectively. The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arteriography/venography for identifying a viable testis was 74% and 67%, respectively. Conclusions: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance arteriography/venography does not accurately identify or localize impalpable testes in the age group typically presenting to pediatric urologists. Accuracy at our institution is discrepant with that in previous studies. We do not recommend using magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance arteriography/venography for the possible observation of vanishing testes or nubbins and we recommend surgical exploration in all individuals.

KW - cryptorchidism

KW - magnetic resonance imaging

KW - phlebography

KW - testis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51249099776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=51249099776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.075

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.075

M3 - Article

VL - 180

SP - 1805

EP - 1809

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 4 SUPPL.

ER -