Making a List and Checking it Twice

Satyen Nichani*, Sandro Cinti, Jeffrey H. Barsuk

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Serologic tests are often used to establish the diagnosis of leptospirosis and ehrlichiosis. Establishing a diagnosis of leptospirosis is challenging and requires a high index of suspicion. Clinicians should be aware of the limitations of the diagnostic accuracy of the serologic assays for leptospirosis because they are frequently negative in the first week after symptom onset. The classic finding of conjunctival suffusion is helpful in differentiating leptospirosis from human ehrlichiosis (HE). The case study discussed in the chapter highlights the importance of the clinical practice of making a list of suspected diagnoses, remaining open to these possibilities, and checking serologic tests again in convalescence to confirm the diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationClinical Care Conundrums
Subtitle of host publicationChallenging Diagnoses in Hospital Medicine
PublisherJohn Wiley and Sons
Pages161-168
Number of pages8
ISBN (Print)9780470905654
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 21 2013

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Diagnosis
  • Human ehrlichiosis (HE)
  • Infection
  • Leptospirosis
  • Serologic tests

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Nichani, S., Cinti, S., & Barsuk, J. H. (2013). Making a List and Checking it Twice. In Clinical Care Conundrums: Challenging Diagnoses in Hospital Medicine (pp. 161-168). John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118483206.ch20