Abstract
This study extends prior research on conflict in teams by showing that a team’s chances of appropriately managing one type of conflict depends on what other types of conflicts are co-occurring. We interviewed 44 managers from different industries who had recently participated in a negotiating team, asking about within-team conflicts and how those conflicts were managed. The data showed that task conflict increased the likelihood that teams managed co-occurring procedural conflicts appropriately, but that procedural conflicts decreased the likelihood that teams managed co-occurring task conflicts appropriately. These results explain why some teams fail to realize the theorized benefits of task conflict and why procedural conflict does not always have a deleterious impact on team performance: The co-occurrence of these different types of conflict can alter what strategy a team uses to manage conflicts.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 501-536 |
Number of pages | 36 |
Journal | Group Decision and Negotiation |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 1 2016 |
Keywords
- Conflict management
- Negotiating teams
- Team conflict
- Team process
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Decision Sciences
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- General Social Sciences
- Strategy and Management
- Management of Technology and Innovation