Market Unfreedom

Paul Gowder*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    7 Scopus citations


    ABSTRACT: John Tomasi's “market democrat” is right to suppose that Rawlsians have erred in omitting economic liberty from their theories of justice. A Rawlsian ought to include economic liberty as a basic freedom because it facilitates individuals' development and pursuit of their conceptions of the good. However, the most plausible version of economic liberty will require the state to guarantee, if possible, that no one will be driven by economic desperation to engage in immiserating work, which may impair rather than facilitate his or her pursuit of the good. There is reason to worry that contemporary economies such as the United States fall seriously short of that ideal.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)306-347
    Number of pages42
    JournalCritical Review
    StatePublished - Oct 2 2014

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Political Science and International Relations
    • Literature and Literary Theory


    Dive into the research topics of 'Market Unfreedom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this